Helena Koivu complained to the Parliamentary Ombudsman for her treatment on the Turku Kakski property.

Helena Koivu photographed in June in the District Court of Southwest Finland. Karoliina Simoinen

Last spring, former ice hockey player Mikko Koivu and his ex-spouse Helena birch The real estate dispute escalated at the Turku Double Villa.

In April, Helena Koivu was removed from the two -time property, which she had been inhabited by a guest house for a long time. Helena also posted videos of the incident on social media.

As a result of the events, Helena Koivu’s representative made a complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the police. The complaint suggested, inter alia, that there were no legal grounds for police measures.

Now the complaint has been given a statement stating that the police have acted in the situation in accordance with the law. The first reported about the matter Staple.

Exit call

The chain of events that had risen to several headlines began on April 2, when Helena Koivu arrived in Turku. Helena Koivu told Iltalehti how the plot gate was locked and Koivu saw men and cars clad in the mask, one of which had a large dog.

According to Helena, the men who covered their face had said they were on Mikko Koivu, and Helena couldn’t get inside.

The statement of the complaint made reveals that the masked men were installing surveillance cameras on the birch summer place. The statement states that the masking of the installers and the cover of the license plates was due to the fact that they did not want to be recognizable by the videos to be shared.

– I realized that the guesthouse locks had been replaced. I couldn’t get in anymore. There was panic and crying, Helena Koivu told Iltalehti freshly.

He called the emergency number and his lawyer.

Helena said she was scared of a big dog and the threat of installers and was hysterical.

Police said the statement was not particularly urgent and that the police had already had several previous tasks due to the disagreements of the parties. After discussing with the lawyer, the Criminal Commissioner ended up in a solution that called Helena Koivu to leave the property.

The ex-cherry has also discussed matters related to the custody of their children. Mikko Koivu and his current spouse, Natalie, photographed in the District Court of Southwest Finland in June. Karoliina Simoinen

The complaint’s response reveals that the police eventually did not remove Helena from the scene, but was transported by an ambulance.

Helena Koivu earlier told Iltalehti that she was taken to the emergency room.

Iltalehti did not reach Mikko Koivu to comment on what had happened recently, but Mikko Koivu’s lawyer commented that everything had happened legally.

“I didn’t know”

The events continued later in April. At that time, the police received a assignment of the property when a break -up alarm, which came from a double -time alarm, had gone to the apartment through the window and had carried the property to the nearby car.

At that time, Helena Koivu told Iltalehti that she went to the property to seek the necessary items she needed in everyday life.

– So I went to get my personal stuff that I hadn’t had for two weeks. I didn’t know the alarms were on, Helena said.

Later, Helena said she had left the scene.

The Police Department of Southwest Finland has given its own statement on both times of events

– Police activities have been based on the exercise of the powers laid down by law. The Police Department considers complaints unjustified for both events.

The Ombudsman who has issued his opinion in the case believes that the police patrol has not taken a non -civilized dispute resolution, distribution of property or housing rights, or measures to promote them.

– According to the Ombudsman’s estimate, there has been no reason to suspect in either case that the police have exceeded their powers or otherwise unjustifiably used more severe means to resolve the matter than needed.

According to the study, Helena Koivu has caused her behavior to disruption to which the police have been justified to intervene and command him to leave. Thus, the police have prevented the immediate recurrence of the disturbance.

ttn-49