He does not report it to the embracing association, which he is not obliged to do.
He goes to a direct competitor and thus maintains his sporting claim, which is his right and also understandable as an athlete. In addition, he comes from a weak team with fears that there will be no sporting improvement. That too is his right.
As far as the facts in which I cannot recognize the player’s misconduct.
The trainer then suspended the player, which is understandable so far.
So far you have grown up.
Now to the behavior that is not understandable, infantile and reputable behavior.
The trainer accuses the player of deliberately provoking a yellow lock because the coach, and he is not even sure that the player’s mother has his birthday that weekend. He does not provide any evidence of this and cannot even say it without uncertainty.
Then attempts are made to assume an undermental without giving great guiding through the numbers. So it seems more like you have compared the best with the worst result without looking at everything in between.
It all sounds like a bad leadership style for me and as if the coach were already preparing arguments in advance in the event that the game was lost.
At this point, I question whether the compliant change of a rotary player really has to cause such a reaction.
I can only say about the player himself that he obviously did everything right with his change. If the working atmosphere is permanently, I would also change the job.
I can only say to the coach that despite his experience, he still didn’t understand business. The risk that a player with a expiring contract, who obviously also has sporting ambitions and whose skills seem to be not too bad (otherwise he would not have pulled the contract on land), signs with a competitor. In the case of the coach’s job, it can be kept the motivation so high that the player can overlook the change in direct meetings or, if that cannot be guaranteed, to simply leave the player outside.
In particular, however, the former in particular does not seem to work, which means that I tend to attest a deficiency performance to the trainer, but not to the player.