Galatasaray Club Sportif AS Vice President Ibrahim Hatipoglu, Fenerbahce Club Vice President Acun Ilıcalı’nın responded to the words.

Hatipoglu, Ziraat Türkiye Cup will be played in the Fenerbahce-Galatasaray derby before the FB TV of the FB TV responded to the statements and “Acun Ilıcalı’nın this year is a pawn I am very aware.” he said.

“Dirty game scene …”

Ibrahim Hatipoglu, who uses hard expressions, said:

“The latest statements made by Acun Ilıcalı, the manager of the rival club who has forgotten competition in the field and built all the concentration of the referee and creates perception, is a continuation of the dirty game scene they created in Turkish football. It would be much healthier if he thinks about how to stay in public memories. “

Questions from Hatipoğlu to Ilıcalı …

Hatipoğlu, who asked some questions to answer Acun Ilıcalı, said:

“Last year played in the critical Fenerbahce-Kasımpaşa match with VAR VAR organized by giving a ‘sensitivity’ penalty to the host by giving a gift to the host, this season with Hatayspor and Kasimpasa in the matches we played in the match, this season, this season, Fenerbahce-Samsspor match is unjustly. It is seen that I have been waiting for any kind of red card from Ilıcalı, who expressed all kinds of fallacy about Galatasaray. “

İbrahim Hatipoğlu completed his words as follows:

“Galatasaray Sports Club, this dirty mentality will be destroyed, green areas of peace and peace to come and competition ‘only’ we wish to remain in the field.”

What did Acun Ilıcalı say?

Fenerbahçe Vice President Acun Ilıcalı made statements before the Ziraat Cup quarter -final match they will play with Galatasaray on Wednesday, April 2.

“First of all, I want to say ‘Foreign referee’ I said on Friday evening, 52. 52. I say, we want a foreign referee. We always want a foreign referee on this issue.

The scandalous section, which is the most interested in my most interested, is; ‘We had the advantage in our inner field on the referee’, had advantages, ‘our opponent by creating perception, creating the agenda of the foreign referee came,’ he says. Exactly, he says, ‘We had the advantage of the referee in the internal field and our opponent created perception, he did it,’ he blames me ‘foreign referee came,’ he says.

I have a question, what kind of referee has the advantage of Galatasaray in the home field? We’ve been asking that for two years. Referees in the home field, Galatasaray did not behave fairly. A Galatasaray manager came out and said, ‘We had the advantage of domestic referees in the home field’. We also say it, yes, you had the advantage in the internal field. We call it a foreign referee to our own home. Fenerbahce Club home match ‘Give a foreign referee, we want justice’ he says. Galatasaray, who wants privilege, regrets, this proof ‘There was a domestic referee in the home field match, pressure was made and translated into a foreign referee’ he says. This is now proof. I will bring this to the agenda in the future. A scandal description. ‘We have an advantage with the domestic referee in the home field’ as of the minute you say that you are pressing on the referees and you are converting them into an advantage. Let them come out and say something else, and I’ll laugh after that. “

ttn-7