Yvonne Coldeweijer wonders why RTL does not intervene after the rumors about the alleged misconduct of Carlo Boszhard. “It’s too expensive for that,” speculates the dreaded juice queen.
In recent months it has been very busy at the Hilversum funeral pyre. The juice channels grilled one after the other celebrities and for a moment A-star Carlo Boszhard threatened to end up on them too. According to both GossipPraat and Yvonne Coldeweijer, he is guilty of misconduct, but there is as yet no evidence of this.
Yvonne speculates
At least, Jan claims that the evidence is piling up, but the general public has not seen any of that. The people at home seem to believe little of it: there is little fuss about Carlo’s alleged misconduct and he did not end up on the Hilversum funeral pyre.
Yvonne finds that strange. “Carlo is known for grabbing colleagues in the crotch without being asked. If Dirty Jeroentje has been canceled because of horny apps and Marc Overmars for his dick pics, why is Carlo’s behavior tolerated? Because colleagues don’t dare to report it,” she writes on her juice channel†
‘Carlo too expensive’
According to Yvonne, it is obvious why RTL is adopting a passive attitude in this file. “RTL does absolutely nothing without a report. Carlo is too expensive for that.”
Format creator Kirsten Jan van Nieuwenhuijzen previously stated that eliminating Carlo would be a huge problem for RTL 4. “It is perhaps RTL’s biggest name at the moment.”
for the bus
In the Carlo file, there is also a lot of criticism of the juice channels, because no evidence is shared. So finds Reporters Online going too far to portray Carlo ‘as the biggest gay scum of Hillywood’.
“Without any further investigation, without hearing either side, without having heard any victims: Carlo Boszhard was – as we call it – thrown in front of the bus.”
‘Huh? Carlo wrong?’
Also New Revue has his reservations. “Huh? Carlo Boszhard at fault? He was always impeccable, wasn’t he? It is indeed questionable what is true of the claims that are made about the presenter/programme maker.”
“Some skepticism may be in order,” the magazine said.
