The taste for power is, possibly, what best distinguishes some people from others. Some people wants to send and who you don’t want it, I wouldn’t do it even if I could. I belong to the second category. I am aware that in the world leaders are needed, so I accept and tolerate the existence of the former. But if they offered me command, I would refuse.
I don’t want empowerment for myself, but freedom. what me send as little as possible, that they leave me space, that they leave me alone and that when they get upset about something I have said, they tell me off without consequences. In recent years, even the want to vote. The only self-determination I claim is to write, after these, the words that come to me.
I think this at the end of a week in which the government has confirmed that live under to people who want to rule: so great is their desire to remain in the fantasy that they rule. Thus, a party that has less than half a million votes and does not even govern its autonomy, together with another that revolves around a YouTube channel with the air of a toothless Czech, have turned the approval of three decrees into the most notorious act of political humiliation that has been seen in recent times.
On the same day, votes that are delayed thirty minutes per alleged technical problems and in which it is hidden from the PSOE deputies that Junts has been offered in those thirty minutes a regional migration of immigration powers, or a vpersonal connection of Podemos against Yolanda Díaz overturning a beneficial decree for “the people.” In Spain one could ask who is in charge, but the most devilish question is why they want to be there.
Related news
How excessive does he have to be? desire to rule of a man when he is willing to occupy the government of a country in the conditions of permanent blackmail in which Pedro Sánchez lives? Does it satisfy that desire, perhaps that thirst, the collective pretense that he is the one in charge and presides when it has been proven, since this first parliamentary souk, that the only thing Sánchez can do is hastily give what others demand of him in a bad way?
To what extent are you willing to the king humble himself so that the lackeys, owners of the guillotine, allow him to wear the crown? Few stories have been more eloquent in this sense than that of the emperor’s new clothes. Sánchez governs as much as that ridiculous monarch dressed in his finery.