Rachel Hazes does not want to say whether the rumor is true that she has once again disinherited André Hazes Jr. and also immediately removed Roxeanne from her will. And with that, of course, she says it all…
More and more craziness is emerging about Rachel Hazes. During one of her many lawsuits – this time against her former best friend Marieke van Beek – it became clear last week that she had disinherited André Hazes Jr. for a while. She wanted to prevent his girlfriend Monique Westenberg from ever benefiting from the inheritance.
Louis Vuitton bag
Rachel confirms this in conversation with her friends Story, but states that it was not her own idea. “That was on Marieke’s advice. It is pretended that I am anti-Monique. Let me start by saying: we have not had a good start. But Marieke talked me into it at the time.”
Then she quotes Marieke: “Old Dré would never have wanted that, you have to lie down for that. Do you want her to walk around with your Louis Vuitton bag?”
“It was her idea!”
She was talked into it, Rachel says now. “I let Marieke guide me and indeed disinherited André. I listened to Marieke and now she throws it at my feet, even though it was her idea! She forgets to mention that it was all reversed later. Marieke knew that too.”
It’s all so painful: would André have known this? Roxeanne told RTL Boulevard that the idea to disinherit André did not come from Marieke: “The idea that the disinheritance would come from Marieke van Beek is a PROVENABLE lie, but I have now come to expect that from Mrs. Van Galen.”
Reversed
Rachel tells the Party yet another version of this story, namely that she received advice to be disinherited from several parties: “I was told from all sides that old Dré would not have wanted it that way: I had to deal with all the rubbish on me for years, while she with an expensive Louis Vuitton bag would walk down the street with the money from the inheritance.”
And that is of course strange: did Marieke advise her or did she decide it herself based on advice ‘from all sides’? Anyway: “Then I indeed disinherited Junior and put Marieke in that place. This was later reversed.”
Still disinherited?
Rachel now has an argument with both André Jr. and Roxeanne. Has she since recovered that disinheritance? “I then repaired that, yes,” she says in Story.
The reporter on duty: “André is still the heir?”
Rachel: “I’m not saying that.”
The reporter: “Is Roxeanne still the heir?”
Rachel: “That was then repaired. Then they were both in my will again. I won’t say more about that.”
In other words: Rachel has disinherited both her children. Let’s see if there will be anything left to inherit if Rox continues the substantive proceedings regarding her father’s estate…