“From time to time he did not have the right answers, he was not precise, he was not a skillful declarant,” said the political analyst. Carlos Fara to CNN, referring to the performance of Javier Milei in it second television debate held on Sunday, October 8 at the Faculty of Law of the University of Buenos Aires. Many specialists agree that the libertarian candidate had notable flaws in his presentation.
The leader of Freedom Advances He was contradictory in many of his proposals presented. Some of these failures contradict certain campaign proposals that had been disseminated by his own team months ago. Journalist Juan Luis Gonzálezauthor of “Crazy”the political biography of Javier Milei, detailed three clear aspects of those errors that the presidential candidate mentioned.
The presidential candidate for Together for Change, Patricia Bullrich, stated that Javier Milei wants to “free the weapons.” Faced with the attack of the former Minister of Security, the libertarian candidate responded: “There is a ‘gun law’ and what we have to do is comply with it”but the Pro leader was forceful, pointing out: “Milei, look at your platform. Article 17. Deregulation and release of weapons. So, if not, change it. But if you change the platform, it is because you were not convinced.”
The contradiction of the anarcho-capitalist candidate in the debate is explicit and became evident in the writing that La Libertad Avanza released to the public and the media at the beginning of the electoral campaign. “Regarding the possession of firearms, we propose the deregulation of the legal market and protecting their legitimate and responsible use by citizens,” explains the platform of the libertarian coalition.
Another contradiction of the leader was revealed when he stated that if he comes to power he will remove Argentina from the Paris Agreement on climate change: ““All those policies that blame humans for climate change are false.”. “We are not going to adhere to the 2030 Agenda, we are not going to adhere to cultural Marxism, to decadence,” added the LLA politician vehemently.
However, the scientific evidence is overwhelming and indicates that climate change is occurring and is a product of human activity. The global average temperature was 1.09°C higher between 2011-2020 than between 1850-1900, a change driven by increasing carbon dioxide emissions. Even in the country, heat waves have become more frequent and prolonged in recent years.
For years there has been a scientific consensus that global warming is a fact and that it is influenced by human action. He Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the United Nations Organization (UN) published a report on August 9, 2021 in which it warns of global warming and highlights that some of the changes could be irreversible.
Another sensitive issue, on which the libertarian politician was on the defensive, was the sale of organs. From the lectern, the presidential candidate once again criticized the organ donation system of the National Central Single Ablation and Implant Coordinating Institute (INCUCAI) with unfounded claims and serious errors. “There are 7,000 people waiting for a transplant and 300,000 potential donors, and something that does not work in the middle,” Milei explained.
This postulate was denied by the same INCUCAI recently on their social networks. “Doctors determine which organs are suitable for transplant. In the case of tissues, it is not necessary for death to occur in intensive therapy. Due to these conditions and requirements, the possibility of being an organ donor occurs in 4 out of every 1,000 deaths,” the organization noted.
We must remember the position that Javier Milei previously had on the sale of organs. In an interview for Diario Perfil conducted by Jorge Fontevecchiain which the social leader participated Juan Grabois, The La Libertad Avanza candidate responded to the picketer about the sale of organs privately with these words “If someone wants to sell it to you, what is the problem?”.
Image gallery
