Viviana Canosa described as “outrageous” the version of Argentinian national anthem in which the singer participated L-Ghent on the occasion of democracy day, and questioned the National Government for promoting the participation of the popular singer of “Cumbia 420”. “I have every feeling that it is a provocation, they do it on purpose. Or do they think that L-Gante is a role model for the youth?”; Canosa started his editorial on the latest broadcast of “Rebaño de aslotudos”; the program of him in Twitch.
“It is outrageous that this kid sings the National Anthem,” Canosa said. “Besides, he has a bullet necklace, bullets! They already kill you in the street to steal your cell phone. What they did with the anthem is horrible, ”she added, outraged.
It should be noted that L-Gante only sang a small part of the Anthem and in a “cumbiero” format; since lyrical singers also participated, and musical figures such as leo garcia Y Guillermito Fernandez. In addition, beyond the “atypical” imprint that L-Gante gave to his part of the national song, there were more symphonic moments, close to the more traditional versions of the anthem, and even a moment that covered the traditional song in the traditional way. of the characteristic music of the culture of the native peoples.
It is not the first time that Canosa has faced the creator of the “Cumbia 420”. In February, after a recital by the singer in Tecnópolis, Canosa shared on her Instagram the image of a child who enjoyed the concert. “Submissive, passive… poor, gross, that’s how they love you,” Canosa commented on the image. L-Gante’s response was immediate: “What’s up, Viviana ‘Carnosa’? Passive will be your choma. What do you grab with an underage boy to unload your disgusting hatred? “The cumbiero replied.
In addition to his questions about the L-Gante version of the National Anthem, Canosa questioned the images projected by the government, particularly the one on the cover of the “Never more”; the report created by the CONADEP when democracy returned. “Some cheeks: the PJ refused to participate in CONADEP, and without CONADEP there would have been “Nunca Más”. What’s more, if the PJ won at 83′ there would be no trial of the soldiers, there was nothing: amnesty for all of them”, declared the host.
by RN
