I disagree with the term “food quota”, it seems reductionist and unkind, I prefer to talk about “comprehensive family obligation”, since it does not only include consumable things, but is a concept oriented towards maximum satisfaction of the child in relation to the interests of the parents.
There must be comprehensive and simultaneous treatment, giving supremacy to all the rights and guarantees recognized both by our national legislation and by the International Convention on the Rights of the Child.
There is a main and underlying issue related to this issue, which has to do with the family financial dynamics that were sustained during the life together of the couple with children. When the expenses were met equitably and in proportion to the income of each of the parents, which is certainly not the most common, it is more likely that this mechanism will be maintained after separation or divorce, but when it existed financial violenceit becomes more visible, is sustained over time and It is extended to children and from this point on, most cases are prosecuted.
Parents advised by their lawyers are the ones who legally represent their children, however the existence of conflicting interests between them and the childrensince if the context were harmonious the debate should take place in a committed and responsible manner, where adults should prioritize the well-being of minors.
Children are not part of these processes in which economic issues are discussed, so why not think that the sentences that establish and quantify said benefit or the approved agreements in which only the will of the parents intervenes, are not resolutions fully valid and enforceable against minors, Why not allow ourselves to question them and conclude that they are a manifest and institutionalized violation that violates the rights of children?
I believe that under no circumstances No judicial decision that alters the well-being and quality of life that children had before the separation of their parents can be considered valid..
There are situations in which the obligor is unable to comply with the obligation in its entirety, but in those cases We are the lawyers who can and must use legal tools that allow us to guarantee full compliance with the obligation.even if this means inviting other family members to the process.
At the same time, the best interests of the child must be placed above those of both parents, even those mothers who have the necessary resources to provide their children with an adequate quality of life, to claim them is to vindicate the right of bothobligations are shared and let us not forget that care tasks also have economic value.
Contact information:
WhatsApp: 221 5896555
instagram: @andrea.perunetti
by CEDOC
