The number of people seriously injured after a corona vaccination is far greater than was previously known. The health politicians would have to react and correct themselves, but they don’t want that, says Gunnar Schupelius.
By Gunnar Schupelius
Doctors at the Charité found that the number of serious complications after vaccinations against corona is 40 times higher than stated by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI).
According to this, eight out of 1000 vaccinated people in Germany are struggling with serious side effects, which is a total of half a million people. With conventional vaccines, the number is “significantly lower”.
The serious side effects include “muscle and joint pain, heart muscle inflammation, excessive reactions of the immune system and neurological disorders, i.e. impairments of the nervous system.”
The study, titled “Safety Profile of Covid-19 Vaccines,” is led by Charité Professor Harald Matthes. The employees have been interviewing 40,000 vaccinated people nationwide for a year.
The result became known in early May. It coincides with the findings of studies abroad and the manufacturers of the vaccines themselves. However, there was no reaction from politicians. There is also a muffled silence in the home of Health Senator Ulrike Gote (Greens).
It now looks as if the data from the Paul Ehrlich Institute is incomplete or even wrong. This institute, which belongs to the federal government, collects reports of side effects.
► Read all of Gunnar Schupelius’ columns
But apparently the side effects were not reported in most cases by the treating physicians. And no effort was made to get them reported.
The health politicians must also feel that they are being addressed because the Charité is making a specific demand for “special outpatient clinics” in which people with vaccination complications can be treated. Such outpatient clinics already exist for the treatment of long-Covid patients.
On the other hand, anyone who suffers from severe side effects of a corona vaccination goes astray from doctor to doctor and does not receive appropriate care because the doctors cannot or do not want to assign the symptoms so as not to be considered “opponents of vaccination”.
While long-Covid patients are recognized by the health insurance companies, those who have been vaccinated have difficulties if they do not have a clear diagnosis.
The result of the Charité survey confirms the widespread reservations about mRNA vaccines. Now it would have to come to a maneuver criticism: Was it right to ignore the risks that were even stated by the manufacturers? Was it right to also vaccinate children, adolescents and young adults who do not even belong to the Covid risk groups?
Was it right to call the vaccine skeptics deniers or even to accuse them of antisocial behavior? Was it right to demand compulsory vaccination and even to enforce it in the health sector?
Instead of dealing with these questions and drawing appropriate conclusions, the findings of the Charité are ignored and almost hushed up.
Strange, when it is always said that we should listen to “the science” in the case of Covid. Scientists have spoken here and no one is listening.
Because the result is annoying. The advocates of nationwide vaccination would have to admit mistakes, for example that they downplayed the risk – and they don’t want that.
Is Gunnar Schupelius right? Call: 030/2591 73153 or email: [email protected]