It was during a match between FC Barcelona and Real Madrid, in 2020
The defendant, Mohammed Yassi Amrani, had planned the drone attack
A accused of indoctrinating himself to collaborate with Daesh in terrorist actions and that he would have received instructions to attack the Camp Nou with drones during a match between Real Madrid and Barcelona in 2020 He has accepted three years in prison after acknowledging the facts of which he is accused.
The accused, Mohammed Yassi Amranihas reached an agreement in accordance with the Public Ministry, by virtue of which He has admitted the facts and the prosecutor has withdrawn the accusation for the crime of active participation in a terrorist organization and has reduced his request for a conviction for a crime of self-training and self-indoctrination to three years in prison.
As a consequence, the president of the tribunal, Francisco Javier Vieira, has announced that a sentence of conformity of three years in prison and absolute disqualification for six years will be issued and has decreed the judgment seen for sentence.
According to the prosecutor’s brief, in March 2020, in full confinement due to the covid pandemic, there was a “transformation of the accused”, which changed “his way of behaving” and became “an authoritarian and intransigent person” , radicalization that ends up being reflected in his Facebook profile.
This, according to research, he was warned by members of Daesh, who contacted him. One of them introduced him to Telegram channels and proposed the commission of an attack, which would consist of the use of a drone with an explosive charge attached to detonate it during a soccer match between Real Madrid and Barcelona, according to the story of the prosecutor.
After formalizing the oath of loyalty or “Bai & Zcaron;at” -he continues-, the accused began to receive instructions to download manuals with the ideological doctrine of Daesh, a training period that would conclude “with a new contact by people of the aforementioned organization to train him technically in the handling of drones”.
The prosecutor maintains that “different people linked to DAESH” would have made him a participant in terrorist plans “in which he was willing to participate” and that the accused had a “firm commitment” to “fulfill the mission”.
For this reason, he believes that his self-indoctrination and self-training was not limited “to the ideological or doctrinal plane,” but that it transcended “self-training in jihadist actions, using the communication channels created by the aforementioned organization.”