The decisions taken by the Arbitration Board are as follows:
1. E.2021/423 – K.2021/437
The objection of Ankara Sports Club to the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board dated 30.09.2021 and numbered E.2021/368- K.2021/487 regarding the dispute between him and football player Emre Can Atila was examined. As a result of the negotiation; Since it is understood that there is no aspect contrary to procedure and principle in the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board, the application is rejected and the decision is approved unanimously,
2. E.2021/424 – K.2021/438
The objection of football player Ömer Faruk Yılmaz to the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board dated 30.09.2021 and numbered E.2021/483- K.2021/507 regarding the dispute between him and the Kardemir Karabük Sports Club Association has been examined. As a result of the negotiation; Since it is understood that there is no aspect contrary to procedure and principle in the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board, the application is rejected and the decision is approved unanimously,
3. E.2021/425- K.2021/439
Sakarya Sports Facilities Management and Trade. A.Ş.’s objection to the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board dated 30.09.2021 and numbered E.2021/515- K.2021/533 regarding the dispute between football player Canberk Ömer Özdemir was examined. As a result of the negotiation; Since it is understood that there is no aspect contrary to procedure and principle in the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board, the application is rejected and the decision is approved unanimously,
4. E.2021/442 – K.2021/440
The petition of the applicant Ahmet Kaya, dated 30.11.2021, was examined. In accordance with Article 7 of the Arbitration Board’s Instruction, it was seen that the application was not made in time. As a result of the negotiation;
– To reject the application in terms of time, unanimously,
– Rejecting the request for a stay of execution, unanimously, since the decision on the application has been made,
5. E.2021/445 – K.2021/441
The objection of Galatasaray Sportif Sınai ve Ticaret Yatırımlar A.Ş. to the Professional Football Disciplinary Board’s decision dated 09.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/438 – K.2021-2022/551 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– Galatasaray Sportif Sınai ve Ticaret Yatırımlar A.Ş.’s post-competition flash interviews were not completed within 30 minutes. Since it was understood that there was no wrongdoing in terms of the fact that he was punished with a fine of 150.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the legal characterization and the determination of the penalty, the application was rejected and the penalty was approved unanimously,
– Due to the field incidents caused by the supporters of Galatasaray Sportif Sınai ve Ticaret Yatırımlar A.Ş., 52/2 of the Football Discipline Instruction. Since it was understood that there was no wrongdoing in terms of proof, legal characterization and determination of the penalty, the application was rejected and the penalty was approved, unanimously,
6. E.2021/446 – K.2021/442
Trabzonspor Sportif Investment and Futbol İşletmeciliği Ticaret A.Ş.’s objection to the decision of the Professional Football Disciplinary Board dated 09.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/442 – K.2021-2022/528 has been examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– 49/1 of the Football Discipline Order of Trabzonspor Sportif Investment and Football Management Trade Inc. due to the illegal admission of spectators to the stadium. Since it was understood that there was no wrongdoing in terms of the fact that he was punished with a fine of 150.000,00 TL in accordance with the article, the legal characterization and the determination of the penalty, the application was rejected and the penalty was approved unanimously,
7. M. 2021/447 – K.2021/443
Yakutiye Sports Club’s objection to the decision of the Amateur Football Disciplinary Committee dated 15.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/433 – K.2021-2022/518 regarding its players Doğukan Örsel and Hamza Budak has been examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– 41/2 of the Football Discipline Order due to the fact that Yakutiye Sports Club player Doğukan Örsel spit on the opposing team player. As it is understood that there is no wrongdoing in terms of proof, legal characterization and determination of the penalty, the application is rejected and the penalty is approved, unanimously,
– Since it is understood that there is no wrongdoing in terms of evidence, legal qualification and determination of the penalty, in the punishment of Yakutiye Sports Club football player Hamza Budak with a ban from 3 official matches pursuant to Article 45/a of the Football Discipline Order due to his involvement in a fight with the opposing team player. affirmation of the penalty by refusal, unanimously,
8. E. 2021/448 – K.2021/444
Arslanbey Sports Club football player Semih Şaşmaz’s objection to the decision of the Amateur Football Disciplinary Committee dated 17.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/421 – K.2021-2022/574 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– Arslanbey Sports Club football player Semih Şaşmaz was banned from 2 official matches in accordance with Article 41/1-a of the Football Discipline Order for insulting the opposing team player. As it has been understood that there is no wrongdoing in terms of proof, legal qualification and determination of the penalty in the punishment of Arslanbey Sports Club football player Semih Şaşmaz with a ban from 3 official competitions pursuant to /1-a and with the application of Article 13, and the suspension of Arslanbey Sports Club football player Semih Şaşmaz from a total of 5 official competitions by combining the penalties, the rejection of the application and the approval of the penalty, unanimously,
9. E. 2021/449 – K.2021/445
Muş 1984 Musspor Club football player Okan Aslan’s objection to the decision of the Amateur Football Disciplinary Committee dated 15.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/395 – K.2021-2022/493 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– Muş 1984 Muş Spor football player Okan Aslan was punished with a ban from 3 official competitions pursuant to Article 43 of the Football Discipline Order due to his violent behavior in the field without the ball. to ratify, unanimously,
10. M. 2021/450 – K. 2021/446
The objections of Ünye 1957 Sports Club footballers Vijdan Aladağ and Mehmet Gülmez to the decision of the Amateur Football Disciplinary Committee dated 15.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/399 – K.2021-2022/456 were examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– Unye 1957 Sports Club football player Vijdan Aladağ was punished with a ban from 3 official competitions pursuant to Article 43 of the Football Discipline Order due to his violent behavior towards the opposing team players. to uphold the sentence, unanimously,
– Unye 1957 Sports Club football player Mehmet Gülmez was punished with a ban from 4 official matches pursuant to Article 43 of the Football Discipline Order due to his violent behavior towards the opposing team player, since it was understood that there was no wrongdoing in terms of the legal qualification and determination of the penalty, the application was rejected. to uphold the sentence, unanimously,
11. M. 2021/451 – K. 2021/447
The objection of Vangölü Sportive Activities Sports Club to the decision of the Amateur Football Disciplinary Board dated 15.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/427 – K.2021-2022/515 regarding his football player Enes Şener has been examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– Since it was understood that there was no wrongdoing in terms of evidence, legal qualification and determination of the penalty, Vangölü Sportive Activities Sports Club football player Enes Şener was punished with a ban from 3 official matches pursuant to Article 43 of the Football Discipline Order due to his harsh and serious foul. to ratify, unanimously,
12. M. 2021/452 – K. 2021/448
The objection of Kınık Belediyespor Club to the decision of the Amateur Football Disciplinary Committee dated 15.12.2021 and numbered E.2021-2022/438 – K.2021-2022/521 regarding the player Muratcan Özel has been examined. As a result of the negotiation;
– Kınık Belediyespor Club football player Muratcan Özel was punished with a ban from 3 official matches in accordance with Article 43 of the Football Discipline Order due to his violent behavior towards the opposing team player. It was approved, unanimously.
.
ttn-7