What happened in Catalonia in October 2017 It has been described on countless occasions as a ‘coup d’état’. For the whole on the right, yes. But also actively and passively on a part of the left. Not only dinosaurs from the PSOE like Alfonso Guerra, today already fully exercising the incentive of the right against the left. The truth is that at some times Even Pedro Sánchez has given wings to the ‘coup d’état’ when, for example, he spoke of ‘rebellion’. This was also the prosecutor Zaragoza’s thesis in the Supreme Court, a thesis that he continued to defend in press articles in ‘El País’ after the conviction for sedition. Which is not minor when an already severe sentence is questioned. Miquel Iceta said privately at that time, before the trial, that anything that exceeded ten years “was a disaster.” Finally, the sentences consummated the disaster that Iceta warned of. But for Zaragoza it was insufficient. Marchena was too lenient a softie when he signed a sentence that totaled 100 years. Then, in his particular crusade, the Supreme Court prosecutor continued doing his thing and did not hesitate to participate in Vox events in the European Parliament to cover that thesis that should unnerve anyone with an attachment to historical memory. Particularly for those who are still looking for their grandparents or great-grandparents. And soon great-great-grandparents because the years go by and despite the laws passed, corpses are identified in dribs and drabs.
Related news
Now it has caused indignation in the Government and the PSOE has shown its rejection for him frivolous use of the concept ‘coup d’état’ against the Government of Pedro Sánchez. Well, of course he’s right! Although at good hours. It happens that this would not be possible if he had stood up to the humiliation of calling what happened in Catalonia in October 2017 a ‘coup d’état’. No matter how much theory is put forward, with all the patriotic rhetoric and heartbreaking chest-beating, with laconic proclamations, comparing the polls of October 1 with the military rebellion of July 1936 is aberrant. An embarrassment beyond measure, perhaps not for those who continue to covertly justify the crusade of the Africanist military and all the atrocities they committed from day one. Starting with the summary executions in Melilla and the massacres in Seville of Queipo de Llano. But yes for all those who are heirs of those who succumbed in that fatal Civil War that liquidated the Republic.
If the frivolity with which the ‘coup d’état’ of October 2017 was criminalized had been stopped, now no one in their right mind would dare to talk about a ‘dictatorship’ or a ‘coup d’état’ on account of the law of amnesty. This does not fall into the legitimate category of celebrating facts or rejecting them outright, it is about moderation, good sense, equanimity, match words to facts. And even decency so as not to drag ourselves through the mud. In the end, we are the ones who sow. Then no one should be surprised that an accidental death is rescued to prosecute those from Tsunami for terrorism. Now, it doesn’t come from one. They just need to go for it Guardiola in defense not of good football but of terrorism.