(New: A new fifth paragraph has been added with a statement by Saskia Esken. The current corona incidence has been inserted in the new second paragraph.)
BERLIN (dpa-AFX) – A few days before most corona restrictions expire, there is continued criticism of the federal government’s pandemic policy. “The position of the Federal Minister of Health is deeply contradictory,” said the head of the Patient Protection Foundation, Eugen Brysch, the editorial network Germany (RND / Monday). “If the law is passed as it was introduced by the federal cabinet, it will make all the work of the last two years obsolete,” said Brysch about the planned change to the Infection Protection Act.
According to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), the nationwide seven-day incidence again reached a high on Monday. The RKI gave the value of new infections per 100,000 inhabitants and week on Monday morning as 1543.0. For comparison: the day before the value was 1526.8. A week ago, the nationwide incidence was 1259.2 (previous month: 1459.8). The health authorities in Germany reported 92,378 new corona infections to the RKI within one day. According to the new information, 19 deaths were recorded across Germany within 24 hours. A week ago there were 24 deaths.
On Wednesday, changes to the Infection Protection Act are to be discussed in the Bundestag for the first time; most of the nationwide corona requirements are to be lifted by March 20th. Just two days later, the plenum is to decide on the controversial draft by Federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) and Justice Minister Marco Buschmann (FDP). Lauterbach and Buschmann propose significantly reduced basic protection for all of Germany. Nationwide, only mask requirements in nursing homes, clinics and local transport should be possible – and test requirements in homes and schools. The mask requirement on trains and planes should also remain nationwide. However, the federal states should be able to decide on further corona requirements for hotspots to be declared. In view of the rapid spread of the virus in the past few days, however, many have doubts about this course.
The green health politician Janosch Dahmen now wants to campaign for a change in the government draft. “I am very much in favor of amending the draft law to reform the Infection Protection Act again and maintaining the obligation to wear masks indoors as a basic protective measure,” said Dahmen to the editorial network Germany (RND/Montag). Brysch also spoke out in favor of improving the mask requirement, but also for a legal right to regular corona tests for those in need of care outside of inpatient facilities and their relatives.
SPD leader Saskia Esken also advocated adequate basic protection – with masks in shops. “Spring is coming, but Corona is apparently staying with us,” said Esken of the German Press Agency in Berlin. “In the new Infection Protection Act, we therefore need adequate basic protection that applies equally everywhere,” said the SPD leader. “This includes masks and 3G in public long-distance and local transport as well as masks in retail. The countries must be able to react to local infection events with more extensive measures.”
The FDP, on the other hand, defended the approach. The abolition of most corona restrictions on March 20 is a great success after two years of the pandemic, said the designated FDP General Secretary Bijan Djir-Sarai of the “Rheinische Post” (Monday). At the same time, the countries remained able to act should the corona situation deteriorate drastically again. “This combination of responsible action and the end of restrictions on freedom is exactly right,” he emphasized.
The federal states want to discuss the situation with Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) on Thursday in a prime ministerial conference. Also on that day, applications for a general obligation to vaccinate will be discussed in the Bundestag for the first time.
The so-called institution-related corona vaccination starts this week. Employees in nursing homes and clinics must submit proof of being vaccinated or recovered by Tuesday – or a certificate that they cannot be vaccinated. Furthermore, a lower level of corona occupational safety is to apply in the future. To this end, the cabinet wants to adopt a regulation from the Ministry of Social Affairs on Wednesday. In the future, employers should largely be able to determine for themselves how they assess the risk and which conditions should still apply in the company./rew/DP/eas