I just don’t understand the hives that it causes lately in some people talk about rich and poor. It could be thought that it is a reaction associated with shame; not of those who have a hard time, of course, who have enough to survive, but of the best situated. And it would be understandable why Poverty has so widened its domain that it is impossible not to feel challenged. But I think the basic trigger for those hives is rather the discomfort It bothers them. For quite a few or many – of whom life smiles, either because of their own merits or because that privilege has fallen from heaven – like the benefits of electricity – the last thing they want is to walk down the street and run into people who he sleeps under an arcade; or that on the radio we talk about hunger queues. And since erasing that reality is impossible, Since extreme poverty cannot be swept under the rug, nor to hide that today a job is no longer a guarantee to live with dignity, it is better to look the other way. The character says it very clearly. louis tosar in the film ‘In the margins’, although he adds that if you once dare to face that dilapidated landscape, you can no longer look away. That is why I refuse to accept that the portrayal and denunciation of inequality is considered out of date and out of date. That infamous comment by a vice president of the Community of Madrid, pretending to look for the poor under the table after a devastating report from Caritas, It seems to me the paradigm of indecency. But apparently he has made a fortune, because now it turns out that talking about rich and poor is confronting the Spanish; or vindicate the condemnation of Francoism and help the families of those shot, an attempt to reopen old wounds. So much so that some presume to be apostolic and Roman, I don’t know where they were the day they talked about charity in catechism class. They still played hooky and were bawling at the girls from a hall of residence. God raises them…
Keep reading….