Pedro Sanchez continues his tour of the Spain of televisions and by means that in Moncloa consider hostile. He broke his refusal to give interviews on programs that he assumed were uncomfortable with Carlos Alsina and this Tuesday has continued with Paul Motorcycles in ‘The Anthill’. Probably at this time more than one of his advisors is thinking why they didn’t do this before.
The President of the Government passed the test without difficulties, placed all his electoral material and introduced a new idea in the campaign when the presenter asked him about the dependency that the PSOE or the PP may have on a future government of the extreme left or the extreme right: “I would not compare Yolanda Díaz with Santiago Abascal“. Applause from the public. It is supposed to be spontaneous.
The socialist leader thus recovered the electoral ticket with Sumar’s candidate, the second vice president and Minister of Labor, whom he praised and defended against a possible alliance between Alberto Núñez Feijóo and Vox. The pacts that the PP is closing with the ultra-right after the result of May 28 also allowed it to poke its rival in the eye for, among other decisions, raising anti-vaccine politicians to the presidency of a regional Parliament, as has happened in the Balearic Islands or support the questioning that Vox makes of gender violence, assuming the concept of intrafamily violence. “It’s opening the doors to a 20-year setback in 20 days,” he said.
Related news
A relaxed Sánchez, to the point of being unrecognizable to those who follow him daily, defended Yolanda Díaz bluntly. “I have worked with her, I know of her democratic commitment, I know of her good work at the head of the Ministry of Labor.” And he shook off the proposal that the PSOE abstain so that Feijóo does not depend on Abascal with various arguments. The obvious and essential that the Socialists are going to win the elections, the verification that the popular seal agreements when they have not won the elections and the resource that he agrees with conservative governments in Europe and also with the bosses. In short, a full-blown ‘no is no’ in case he were to find himself in that position in a few months.
Prepared for all the complicated questions, he even confronted with historical resources the problem of credibility that is attributed to him. I am not lying, I change my position, he repeated, on issues such as the conflict with Catalonia, to then argue that in no case can the Spaniards think that this means taking them for fools. Because before him the same thing has happened to other presidents. To Adolfo Suárez with the outlawing of the PCE that he promised not to do and ended up being one of his greatest contributions to democracy. Or Felipe González with NATO. “That is not lying, that is rectifying and they did it well.” They no longer ask me outside of Spain, he reiterated, what happens in Catalonia after his decision to insult those convicted of the ‘procés’, eliminate the crime of sedition and modify the embezzlement.