National coach Nagelsmann praises the DFB team after the trip to the USA and is not worried

First of all, thank you for the well-written text, I would like to add a little.

Quote from Ballzumir

I saw the game tonight, here’s my take on it.

Mexico was indeed a strong opponent. The way they played reminded me of Italy at the last European Championship. Aggressive and compact at the back, but not always confident and confident in contrast to Italy, usually extremely fast and direct at the front and outnumbered by a few high-quality players.
When they had time to move up it became even more dangerous, with the midfield not quite having the quality of the first line of attack.

I would particularly like to single out Lozano, an extremely dangerous man who has created most of the dangerous situations and is essentially their sane.

Quote from Ballzumir

The German defense had big problems with this. This was largely due to the setup.
I would describe it like this: a 3-man chain + a left-wing player who stands 20 m in front of the defense, plus Gündogan as a 6-man for building up the game and passing point, often only 5 m in front of the defensive line.
This led to a huge hole in the LV because Gosens was almost never present there and when he was, then too late, like when the cross for the second goal was created, where there was so much space in the middle that it was a 1.67 m Mexican scores the header goal.

On the right side, Süle, as part of a 3-man chain without a line player in front of him, had far too much space that he had to protect, especially since he is better when he comes out of the penalty area than when he protects the sideline, which he has never learned and where he is pretty good seems lost.
In addition, there is this (im)kind of German defense, in which balls are not hit forward or cleared into touch, but instead you force yourself to combine at the back. As a result, they often put themselves in unnecessary trouble against advancing Mexicans and so the first goal was conceded after a pass from Rüdiger that was too short.

I can sign like that, usually one of the central defenders was at the front of the attack, so there was usually one missing at the back. I don’t think that’s particularly clever tactically, as that’s how most of the counterattacks and chances for the opponent were created. I also didn’t think the so often praised central midfield with Gündogan and Groß was ideal. I’m missing a strong defensive player and I’m still insisting on Vitaly Janelt. Janelt in front of the defense – followed by play builder Gündogan and in front of him the young, wild Musiala, Wirtz and Sane. I also didn’t see any added value from Müller. On the contrary – we have once again seen how important a real centre-forward from Füllkrug is at the front. I also think it’s wrong to compulsively combine out instead of playing the ball cleanly out of bounds. Sometimes there are situations where you simply have to shoot the ball onto the roof of the stadium in order to be able to form again.

Quote from Ballzumir

I liked Thiaw better and more clearly after his substitution, you can tell that he can hardly afford to make any mistakes at Milan due to the competition and opponents.

Unfortunately I have to disagree here. I consider Thiaw to be the best option alongside Rüdiger, but Thiaw lost the ball, especially at the beginning. I think you could see his insecurity. But towards the end I really liked it.

Quote from Ballzumir

I actually only liked Germany offensively in the second half of the first half, after they had adjusted a bit to the pressure from the Mexicans.
The structure of the game using Gündogan, Wirtz, Musiala and Groß has been called that for years, especially the first three mentioned have security on the ball, which should actually always be the case with this team. After the substitutions of Wirtz and Groß, the game seemed more complicated and less attractive to me.
Despite good combinations, the German forward game is not direct and goal-oriented enough for me. So the 1-0 (still undeserved at the time) had to come from a corner. The second goal in one of the few situations where it was quickly prepared by Sane with a move to the goal and a subsequent pass into the middle.
Filling jug – not a feast for the eyes – but as always there when needed.

Gosens is very present at the front, but not present at the back. Müller can hardly be seen in such a fast-paced game, but is still a goal threat. If you want to control the game, I wouldn’t bring them both right from the start, but in the last half hour when the opponent gets tired they can make the difference.

We’ve never had any major problems offensively in recent years and I still don’t see that happening. Even if you’re hoping for a brilliant moment from Sane, you won’t be disappointed. Something can always happen up front with Musiala, Wirtz, Sane and Füllkrug. And the switching options aren’t the worst either. Gosens was particularly dangerous when it came to set pieces (and no, he didn’t shoot them, but as a header).

Quote from Ballzumir

Conclusion:
If you compare the N11 under Nagelsmann with the one under Flick, you can finally see motivation and commitment again.
If you compare the N11 under Nagelsmann and Völler, I miss the simplicity and a clear concept.
If you tend to have problems defensively, you should play with a simple chain of 4 and not give players an asymmetrical chain of 3, which tends to create holes even with optimal shifts.
I’ve missed direct play going forward for years. Too much is being sought at the front and back to have the majority, instead of asking the players to trust in their abilities and sometimes find their way to the goal when they are outnumbered in order to make the game quick. Even if this requires high technical skills, longer passes that are harder to process, overview and timing, more speed and more space would be the reward.
I would only let the whole team train 3 against 6.smile

Instead, too much emphasis is placed on keeping the ball, according to the motto that if we have the ball, the others can’t score a goal. Which doesn’t even work because the ball losses are all the more surprising and dangerous if you don’t master the short passing game like Spain or City.

So far the team is still benefiting from the motivation under a new coach, with one win and one draw. The initial motivation under Flick led to 8 wins in a row.
Approaches can be seen, but I remain skeptical that there will be a functioning concept for all parts of the team under Nagelsmann until the European Championships (or in the long term). He is now repeating mistakes from his time at Bayern too much, both front and back, and the differences between his idea of ​​football and Flick’s are too small.

I think you can tell the team has a completely different spirit. Nagelsmann seems to be the right man. The fact that he is now relying on one tribe and only occasionally replacing people is also extremely smart. I’m curious to see whether Nagelsmann will continue to ignore Vitaly Janelt and how he will integrate Kimmich into the team. If he repeats the mistake of his predecessors and places Kimmich at number 6, it will be very difficult for the coming games. Kimmich would be brilliant as a right offensive full-back.

Ps. What annoys me incredibly is Rüdiger’s constant provocations. If you keep seeing your opponents making faces on TV, for me it no longer has anything to do with fair play. Unfortunately, Rüdiger has become a very strong central defender, so you would be doing yourself a lot of harm if you didn’t rely on him anymore. I hope Nagelsmann will work on it too and instill more discipline and respect in him.

ttn-38