Most expensive squad: RB Leipzig & Al-Hilal paid more than FC Barcelona

Transfer market statistics

The RB Leipzig and Al-Hilal squads cost more on the transfer market than the current FC Barcelona team – and all three together spent about as much on their players as Chelsea alone. A look at the international purchasing value statistics on TM shows how much transfer fee each club has paid for its players and how this sum relates to the current squad value.

Most expensive squads in the world: These teams received the highest transfer fees

BVB | Squad value: €467 million | Transfer fees paid: €310 million

&copy IMAGO

Value creation: +157 million € | As of September 11, 2023

AS Monaco | Squad value: €332 million | Transfer fees paid: €325 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€7 million

FC Barcelona | Squad value: €814 million | Transfer fees paid: €327 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€487 million

RB Leipzig | Squad value: €403 million | Transfer fees paid: €336 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€67 million

Atlético Madrid | Squad value: €442 million | Transfer fees paid: €361 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€81 million

Al Hilal | Squad value: €259 million | Transfer fees paid: €372 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: -€113 million

SSC Napoli | Squad value: €578 million | Transfer fees paid: €373 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€205 million

Aston Villa | Squad value: €598 million | Transfer fees paid: €418 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€180 million

Juventus Turin | Squad value: €433 million | Transfer fees paid: €429 million

&copy IMAGO

Value creation: +4 million €

FC Bayern | Squad value: €897 million | Transfer fees paid: €430 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€467 million

West Ham | Squad value: €443 million | Transfer fees paid: €457 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: -14 million €

Newcastle United | Squad value: €598 million | Transfer fees paid: €566 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€32 million

Real Madrid | Squad value: €991 million | Transfer fees paid: €573 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€418 million

Tottenham | Squad value: €689 million | Transfer fees paid: €656 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€33 million

Liverpool | Squad value: €827 million | Transfer fees paid: €664 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€164 million

Arsenal | Squad value: €1.09 billion | Transfer fees paid: €685 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€406 million

PSG | Squad value: €1.08 billion | Transfer fees paid: €943 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€140 million

Man City | Squad value: €1.18 billion | Transfer fees paid: €992 million

&copy IMAGO

Value added: +€190 million

Man United | Squad value: €882 million | Transfer fees paid: €1 billion

&copy IMAGO

Value added: -€118 million

Chelsea | Squad value: €926 million | Transfer fees paid: €1.01 billion

&copy IMAGO

Value added: -€86 million

Barça paid 327 million euros in fees for his team, which as of today has a total value of 814 million euros. The difference of +487 million euros is top worldwide in another statistic that was led by FC Bayern for years.

Out of necessity, the Catalans changed their transfer strategy from 2021 and increasingly focused on free transfer players such as Andreas Christensen or Ilkay Gündogan. These increase the squad value without incurring transfer payments and if things don’t fit, they are sold, as was the case with Franck Kessié or Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang.

At the same time, they trusted more in homegrown players like Gavi, Ronald Araújo, Alejandro Balde and Lamine Yamal, whose market values ​​went through the roof, and strengthened themselves with top loan players in the person of João Félix and João Cancelo. Not to mention Barça’s most valuable professional, Pedri, who increased his market value from 7.2 million to 100 million euros since 2020.

These numbers not only look good in statistics, but also brought success back to the Camp Nou in LaLiga. Manchester City’s greatest sporting triumph in 2022/23 was their treble – the Champions League winners also pursued a different approach with different financial requirements. While the professional squad is continuously being strengthened with well-known transfers, the “Citizens” youth academy produces top talents year after year, who sometimes find their way into Pep Guardiola’s team and are even more often sold for high fees.

Man United with the biggest minus between purchase value and squad value

Man City’s current squad is worth 1.18 billion euros, includes 24 players who joined the team with an average age of 24.3 years and cost 992 million euros in transfer fees. Only Manchester United and Chelsea paid more. While 1.01 billion euros were due in transfer fees for the 29-man Blues team, the “Red Devils” invested 1 billion euros, significantly more than their current squad value of 882 million euros.

Biggest plus between transfers and squad value: Bayer & Bayern in the top 10

Union Berlin | Difference between transfer fee and squad value: €147 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fee paid: €46 million | Squad value 193

Athletic Bilbao | Difference between transfer and squad value: €156 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fee paid: €46 million | Squad value 203

BVB | Difference between transfer and squad value: €157 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €310 million | Squad value: €467 million

AS Roma | Difference between transfer and squad value: €159 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €223 million | Squad value: €382 million

Liverpool | Difference between transfer and squad value: €164 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €664 million | Squad value: €827 million

Galatasaray | Difference between transfer and squad value: €174 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €71 million | Squad value: €245 million

Aston Villa | Difference between transfer and squad value: €180 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €418 million | Squad value: €598 million

Benfica | Difference between transfer and squad value: €181 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €164 million | Squad value: €345 million

Brentford | Difference between transfer and squad value: €183 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €182 million | Squad value: €365 million

Brighton | Difference between transfer and squad value: €183 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €193 million | Squad value: €376 million

Lazio | Difference between transfer and squad value: €186 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €99 million | Squad value: €285 million

Man City | Difference between transfer fee and squad value: €190 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €992 million | Squad value: €1.18 billion

SSC Napoli | Difference between transfer and squad value: €205 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €373 million | Squad value: €578 million

Bayer 04 | Difference between transfer and squad value: €214 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €232 million | Squad value: €446 million

AC Milan | Difference between transfer and squad value: €224 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €305 million | Squad value: €529 million

Inter | Difference between transfer and squad value: €301 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €223 million | Squad value: €523 million

Real Sociedad | Difference between transfer and squad value: €307 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €91 million | Squad value: €398 million

Arsenal | Difference between transfer and squad value: €406 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €685 million | Squad value: €1.09 billion

Real Madrid | Difference between transfer and squad value: €418 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €573 million | Squad value: €991 million

FC Bayern | Difference between transfer and squad value: €467 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €430 million | Squad value: €897 million

FC Barcelona | Difference between transfer and squad value: €487 million

&copy IMAGO

Transfer fees paid: €327 million | Squad value: €814 million

Although these are always just snapshots, it is not a particularly good sign if the purchase value (transfers paid) so significantly exceeds the squad value. This suggests that either the transfer fees are too high, the players are not increasing their market value as a result of the transfer, or both. Only Al-Hilal (-€113 million), which went “all in” in the summer, has a similarly large loss in the difference between purchasing and squad value (for statistics) compared to Manchester United (-118 million). . €). But part of the truth is that the Premier League clubs and some Saudi clubs start with completely different financial conditions than SSC Napoli, BVB or Atlético Madrid.

FC Bayern turns talent into stars and increases their market value

There is an increase of 467 million euros at FC Bayern when comparing the transfer fees paid and the current squad value (for statistics). If the Catalans hadn’t signed loan players worth 100 million euros on deadline day, Munich would still be number one. Why are Bayern up there? Joshua Kimmich, Serge Gnabry, Alphonso Davies and Jamal Musiala, for example, were signed as young talents for around 30 million euros and developed into valuable performers who today have a cumulative market value of 310 million euros.

The Munich team also likes to rely on free transfers (Goretzka, Laimer, Guerreiro, Mazraoui) as well as players with short contract terms who can be bought below market value – record purchase Harry Kane was the exception. Thanks to the club’s successful history and comfortable financial situation, they can often attract top players without offering horrendous sums and, most importantly, the record champions can keep (almost) all of their stars. FCB currently has a squad value of €897 million.

The situation is completely different with the national competition: Borussia Dortmund, Bayer Leverkusen, Eintracht Frankfurt and most recently RB Leipzig sometimes serve as training clubs for the Premier League or the heavyweights from Spain, Italy and PSG. Within the Bundesliga, all clubs have a positive balance in terms of value creation and so the squads are all worth more than the sum of the transfer fees paid for them.

To home page

ttn-38