Due to the protests from the fan scene, the DFL has rejected plans to bring in investors. Martin Kind now criticizes this.
Managing director Martin Kind of the second division club Hannover 96 criticized Hans-Joachim Watzke for his statements at the end of the investor process at the German Football League.
In his role as spokesman for the DFL executive committee, Watzke also justified the decision to stop the controversial investor plans with the events at the Lower Saxony club. There has been a long-standing dispute between the management of the Hannover 96 club and the football corporation.
“They should stand by that too”
“It’s the DFL’s concept. They should stand by it. They have developed this strategy and have now ended the process,” said Kind in an interview with the “Süddeutsche Zeitung”. “What does that have to do with my voting behavior?”
The 36 DFL clubs from the 1st and 2nd Bundesliga decided on the possible entry of an investor on December 11th with the required two-thirds majority of 24 votes. 96 managing director Kind is assumed to have voted for it contrary to the instructions of the club’s management.
“It’s wrong that Mr. Watzke declares the 50+1 rule to be in place”
Resistance to the entry of an investor came primarily from the organized fan scene. There were protests at games in the 1st and 2nd Bundesliga and there were numerous interruptions. Child was also the target of protests by Hanover supporters. Banners with his portrait in a crosshairs were displayed around the stadium.
The background is the dispute over the 50+1 rule. This limits the influence of external donors to professional clubs. It is intended to ensure that parent clubs such as Hannover 96 eV retain final decision-making power even if the professional area has been spun off into a corporation such as Hannover 96 GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Kind is considered a critic of the rule and has been calling for changes for a long time. That’s why he also criticized Watzke for his categorical adherence to 50+1. “I think it’s wrong that Mr. Watzke declares the 50+1 rule to be in place in its current form. Because he’s already saying: Changes can’t happen at all,” said Kind.