For a good word: what is the omvolkingstheorie?
“Zullen we start with what it is not? How many people think that shows the omvolkingstheorie not about the change in the seeding of the population by migration. That is so oud as de mensheid. Wel is therefore the theory of a doel-conscious plan of the cosmopolitan elites om migrants met a different genotypic in culturele achtergrond het land in the loodsen en daarmee de own cultuur te. Now that the army is connected, the idea is that migrants erop uit zijn om hun cultuur en hun raciale kenmerken zo snel mogelijk te laten domineren – dat is a tweede cruciaal element.”
“One of the characteristics is the anti-Semitic ondertoon she quotes. That’s what I’m saying about the theory behind it: that’s what’s happening with the idea that I’m not doing anything I’m trying to say about it. The stereotype is enormous and strong.”
“The three ideas zijn natuurlijk aantoonbare onzin. Maar ze spelen wel in op de gevoelens van mensen that it has changed in the same leving. That last thing is ontegensprekelijk waar: Zeker in the last thing elsehalve eeuw is the people in heel wat Landen because migration changed.”
How old is the theory?
“Uiteindelijk gaat de theorie terug op negentiende-eeuwse racistische vorstellingen uit de Verenigde Statesen. That’s what Madison Grant wrote in 1916 and a large number of invloedrijk books The Passing of the Great Race, which means that the American population will be divided by immigrants from South and East Europe. That book also had a large share in Europe, bivoorbeeld op de young Nazi movements in Hitler in the 20’s.”
It is not the first thing that has been said about the theory when it comes to terrorism.
“Je zou can zeggen dat de theorie sinds de moorden that Anders Breivik pleegde in 2011 an international dimension heeft gained. In all sorts of chat groups, the ideas were immediately given. Dat verklaart was mensen op verschillende plekken op de aardbol zeggen: ‘When it’s real, we just want to do it.’”
“Je zou de schuders can ophalen en zeggen dat dit en raar idea is. Maar as mensen deze ideas really gaan geloven, can suffer tot what we open weekend zagen in Buffalo.”
How true is it then that mainstream politics such as Filip Dewinter that discours toch used?
“Radical right-wing politicians who serve you from the theory, want to be aware of that because you are going to use Buffalo van Levensgevaarlijke brandstof voorzien. Even though Dewinter does not have original origins in the writings of Renaud Camus over, there are always political issues as a result of the complot idea that migrants have in mind for ‘ons’. Daarmee zit je al snel in a racist hoek.”
What can we do then?
“Mainstreampolitici want a lot of steviger and a principle standpoint inside and say: ‘It’s not all bad, it’s racist and gevaarlijk.’ Alleen: depending on the number of political parties in the mainstream that have never been done. Soms ze he zelfs elements uit over, so that the migration of Muslims is problematic. Of that naïve, linkse en cosmopolitan elites de concerns van ‘het real people’ niet zien.”
“Dat ervoor dat elements van zo’n theorie veel Breder been aanvaard. As a result, the elements mixed with dagdagelijkse waarnemingen have been changed, which have not changed since the beginning of the year. Maar de hele ideologie aft de theory, which is uitermate problematic.”