They are so united (or so they say), that the logical thing would be that if one falls, the other falls, but we all know that that will not happen. The weakest link in the chain is, always, the coach and, in the case of the FC Barcelona more than in any other case, then, to the first curves (by the way, a criticism that has always been made Xavi Hernandez to the press), it was the Terrassa coach himself who said that he will get off the wagon, that he will abandon, “if I don’t manage to win a title and, yes, it will be time to quit.”
At this moment and given the happy life that the president lives Joan Laportaperhaps it would be a good moment, having already lost two of the four titles that they predicted they would win, to start looking at the box and holding the maximum leader responsible (the maximum at all, since he alone governs the club without CEO neither Managing Director) of everything that is happening: nothing works, the economy is a ruin despite the levers (wasted), they cannot sign, the reinforcements, worth more than 270 million euros (great advice from And you, Germany and Masipnext to mendesof course), they are a disaster and Barça’s reputation has begun to decline in the global rankings, worldwide, managed by the bodies that measure them.
Authentic Dragon Khan
We can review the grotesque situation that Laporta lives and endures, who has been the one who has pushed Xavi to live in this Dragon Khan senseless, illogical, unreal, lying and disproportionate. True, the ‘mister’ has bought from his president the biggest lie in recent decades and, now, neither of them is going to have the humility and good sense (they are not even surrounded by people who push them to do so) to tell the truth, ask for forgiveness, direct the course with simplicity and common sense (the least used sense in culé governance).
But first, let’s review the last lie, which was the first, about the endorsements. Well, the first was to say that he would renew Leo Messi, “because only by voting for me, that will be possible.” When Laporta stood for election, she did so with one hand behind and one in front. He had no way to guarantee the 124.6 million euros, which would allow him and his friends (and family) to become president of Barça. When one of the millionaires who supported him externally (and who, now, speaks ill of him), reminded him of this ‘small’ detail days before the vote, Laporta reproached him for having “no idea, but no idea! ” of what it means to be president of Barça. “I will have a line of banks that will offer me the guarantee,” he told him.
Not only did there not be a line, but 80% of the members of the board had to ask for help, favors (who knows at what cost), borrow money and only the miraculous appearance of billionaires saved them at dawn. “So there would be a line of banks, right? Yes, there is a line,” the protective friend told him. And, yes, now, hand in hand with Toni Frieros (‘Sport’ newspaper) and Victor Malo (‘Culemania’)we have learned that they are still fighting over the endorsement, more than two years later.
That is why it is time (sorry, or not) to remember the response that Laporta gave, in the RAC1 pre-electoral debate, with Jordi Basté as moderator, to the question of Victor Font, who wanted to know where the lawyer would get the guarantee from. “The endorsement can be explained perfectly,” Laporta said haughtily. “We are negotiating with a bank, we have approved the guarantee structure, the 16 or 17 members of the board of directors will support this guarantee, if we win. And it will be deposited in LaLiga and, once deposited in LaLiga, there will be no inconvenience or problem in explaining how this amount has been guaranteed, which is important, yes. In any case, when you have credibility and experience, the bank is willing to offer you this guarantee.
Squid ink
That’s why I say that we stop looking at Xavi and look at Laporta for a while, his management, his way of governing and directing Barça. Those words, now that we know what we know, how they are fighting among themselves for not wanting to pay or for paying more than others, it would be a good time to review those accounts. why your brother Xavier put 650,000 euros; because the Israeli businessman Morris Moshe put 500,000 euros (or more), why a North American company ISL Futbol LLC He put in 200,000 euros. How, why and in exchange for what.
Related news
It is normal for Laporta to argue with the referees and the VAR, despite having a glass ceiling due to the ‘Negreira case’. It is normal for the president to throw squid ink and smoke to cover up his delicate situation. The sporting drift is a disaster, he personally changed the call for the Champions League match played in Antwerp, he has put the club in even more debt, he has squandered 270 million on players who, now, are not worth a third (and, Furthermore, they are not decisive), he has had to file a complaint with Libero Finance AG for the goal that scored the partners in the (supposed) sale of 10% of Barça Vision (the economic vice president remains silent)….
There was no plan, there was no program, there was no money, the best professionals abandoned him (namely what they saw or heard), he lives hanging on improvisation, he commands an inconsistent group of family, friends and plugged-ins and, in such circumstances, Laporta , a master at anesthetizing the fans, embraces the refereeing controversy because with it he identifies an external enemy, placing the focus on the emotional issue, with which he tries to keep the ‘gent blaugrana’ (or, at the very least, the 30,184 who voted for him) and, above all, prevent them from thinking about his particular style of governance, unique and trilero.