Milei’s triumph is part of a broader phenomenon: the crisis of representative democracy. It would be wrong to assume that if it fails there can be a return to the past. It has an important international impact because it is the purest expression of the new politics that is breaking out in the West.
Those who interpreted his campaign as an expression of voters’ anguish over the situation to which Kirchnerism led us are wrong. There was no depression in Milei’s campaign, they did not want to be austere, nor reject joy. That was the style of a sector of Together for Change that had become solemn, consumed by Hubrys syndrome.
Milei’s campaign communicated intention to change. They shouted “Long live Liberty Damn”, carrying out the transgressions of young people that scare conservatives. Milei reiterated that he would not remove the plans, that his adjustment was going to be enormous, but it would not affect the people, but rather the political caste. He was surrounded by new people. Its core was made up of young people.
Milei’s gestures, who had no problem going places showing simplicity, greeting Chiche Gelblung, people who crossed her on the street, her body language frequently carrying objects in her hands, the distance she took with homophobic comments from another collaborator, They turned him into a character who could empathize with rebellious youth that he did not want to hold back nor was he frightened by his supposed follies.
As he has announced, when he is sworn in, he will address the people from the steps of Congress. He called for a flag so that his followers come to listen to him.
Start the Columbus evening with the Ballad for a crazy It is a human gesture that denotes a sense of humor and turns an accusation into a flag. I hope Hubrys syndrome doesn’t hinder the freshness of your communication.
