One of the debates during these days of the motion of censure has focused on whether Vox’s action in Congress was lawful or if, on the contrary, it only sought to distort the always healthy constructive intentions of the Constitution by censoring a government.
Article 113 of the Magna Carta, in its point 1, ensures that “the Congress of Deputies can demand the political responsibility of the Government through the adoption by absolute majority of the motion of censure & rdquor; and in point 2 it describes that the motion “must be proposed by at least one tenth of the deputies& rdquor ;. The action is tailored to the colon. Therefore, There is no malpractice or malpractice.
Having overcome this debate, which has become a mantra these days, interest is in the effect that the action of Santiago Abascal could have, via Ramón Tamames. What has Abascal won? What does Pedro Sánchez lose? Has Vox failed in its money laundering attempt? Has President Sánchez taken advantage? And Yolanda Diaz?
From the outset, joking around this motion was a mistake. The rules of the game are what they are and from that point of view Vox has not played it wrong. Ramón Tamames’ speech was a general diagnosis that many could have partially signed, especially those on the right, restoring Tamames’s face for another.
All the ideology that he could present was through specific issues that avoided showing political messages. That’s why he was a mere diagnosis without proposals for solutions.
Related news
The question is whether the content of the motion is Vox’s electoral proposal. And it doesn’t seem Thus, the Tamames operation is clearly a laundering actionled by the very smart Sánchez Dragó, in the style of his ‘Gárgoris y Habidis’, which the economics professor played with one last parliamentary ‘show’.
Posts to give medals, these would be awarded to Tamames that, although tiring, seem to levitateand Yolanda Díaz, lucky enough to present her party the same day that the extreme right showed its shame in Congress.