“If he had returned to my side this would not have happened”

Cold as an ice floe – the same coldness that he showed last Sunday when he dealt each one of the stab wounds to his son -, showing no hint of regret during the hour and a half that his statement before the judge lasted, recounting in detail his brutal crime while Jordi, eleven years old, blood of his blood, tried to escape from his father’s home, in Sueca. And even coming to blame his murder victim of the little one for having abandoned him. “If he had returned to my side, this would not have happened,” he released with contempt for his ex-partner and mother of the minor parricide, alleged until there is a firm conviction of reviewable permanent prisonthe maximum penalty contemplated by the criminal code and which he will face in a more advanced phase of the procedure.

José Antonio AC, 47, is already in prison after the owner of the Court of Instruction number four of Sueca, acting as a guard and also the competent in the case as he is in charge of violence against women, agreed yesterday to enter provisional prison, communicated and without any possibility of bail. The order of entry into prison collects up to four crimes. On the one hand, the murder by the treacherous death of the minor, unable to defend himself against his father’s attack – which also implies the aggravating factor of kinship – armed with a small knife. Also for the psychological abuse of the mother due to vicarious violence. The arrested himself acknowledged before the judge that he ended the life of his own son because he knew that it was what his ex-wife wanted most in this world, to cause him inhuman pain. “She is dead in life, she just wants to go with her son”indicated sources from the environment of the child’s mother.

In addition, he is charged with ill-treatment episode occurred in March 2021 -prior to the conviction- when he threw his partner on the bed and he grabbed her tightly by the neckand a crime of continued violation of sentence for repeatedly failing to comply with the 200-meter restraining order and for communicating with her ex-partner and mother of the child that this same court issued in August after a quick trial.

In fact, since they separated last summer, the alleged murderer had been harassing your ex with incessant messages and calls to come back to him. “I was afraid and thought that if I reported it it would be worse.”, argues a friend of María Dolores. The same night before the crime and throughout the morning of Sunday, April 3, José Antonio AC made dozens of calls to his ex-partner and sent him messages demanding to see the child, ignoring the prohibition to communicate with his victim issued by the judge next to the sentence of 40 days of work for the benefit of the community, and that it was still in force.

“You can’t be good, she took him that morning so he could be with his father for a few hours and celebrate his birthday with him and look what he wanted,” laments Mari Carmen, who is also very critical of the judge’s decision. Do not prohibit visits. “She had no choice but to leave it to him, if she did not expose herself to him denouncing her for breaching the regime that the judge had marked”exposes this friend, while clarifying that in any case she did not trust him completely and never let him stay to sleep, “I used to leave him on Sundays for an hour or two”.

The day of the crime the alleged murderer she asked her to stay too to celebrate her birthday of the child, “I wanted to kill them both”, maintains this friend about the parricide’s intentions. However, her mother, who was terrified of her but he never thought he could do any harm to the son of both, she went to Sueca accompanied by her maternal grandmother, and left the little one in the corner, so as not to approach her aggressor. It was 1:00 p.m. Just half an hour later, when she had already returned to Cullera, the municipality where she resides, his son sent her an audio asking her to go pick him up, that he did not want to be with his father.

The frightened woman called him and heard a scream. Immediately afterwards and without being able to talk to the little boy to find out how he was, he quickly went to Sueca, while calling his paternal grandmother, who lives in the vicinity of his son. When the old woman arrived at the house, on Rafael Hervás street, the minor was still alive, due to the screams that came from inside. He tried unsuccessfully to get his son to open the door for him, even trying to kick the door down. At the time he ran to notify the Civil Guard, the murderer finished executing his crime