Guido den Aantrekker finds it reprehensible how Johan Derksen has spoken on television about the much-discussed Rachel Hazes. “He’s just really kicking her!”
Now that André Hazes’ will is out on the street, according to critics it is as clear as day that Rachel Hazes has unjustly stepped forward as his heiress all these years. According to Johan Derksen, it is ‘criminal’ how she has taken everything to herself at the expense of her children. “You can’t imagine stealing from your children, can you?”
Guido is angry
It seems that Johan’s criticism was the last straw for Rachel, because late yesterday afternoon she suddenly came up with a statement in which she is vulnerable (see below): “I feel sad and have been sleeping badly for weeks. I am publicly despised, mocked and downright laughed at. I wonder if people realize what the impact of this is.”
Guido den Aantractor, as Rachel’s media representative, is also completely over the moon. The Story boss normally always tweets that he is so excited for the Today Inside broadcasts, but now that the VI men come to Rachel, he has lost his laughter. He was clearly angry at the desk last night Show news.
Kicking John
Guido expresses his disgust at Johan Derksen. “I think it’s quite a touching cry for help from Rachel. I think people might underestimate it a little bit. I have to tell you honestly: I always try to look at it objectively, because there is always another side to a story.”
He continues: “If I see Johan Derksen, for example, who is really really kicking against Rachel Hazes… While the good, best man knows nothing of course, doesn’t he? The media now bases itself on a few fragments from a will that has been published in a number of media (at competitor Privé, ed.).
“He’s raging!”
Johan is no longer with Guido. “John is just raging. I won’t repeat what he said about Rachel, but it’s clear that he’s not necessarily on her side. (…) Everyone gets involved and she is constantly being told what a terrible mother she is. People don’t know about that at all.”
Colleague Dyantha Brooks: “What do you know about that? Because you’ve known her for a long time, right?”
Guido: “Yes, I will see all the socials again tomorrow that I am Camp Rachel. I just call it real bullshit, let’s just call it so flat, but I know her well, I know the family well, for over 22 years. I know what happened.”
Administrative error
What does Guido know about that legacy? “You should not only look at the letter of a will, but also at the spirit. No one can say with a dry eye that Rachel and Andre senior were not together in the last year before his death. They were happier than ever. I have seen it myself, that he often sat with her in that house in Buitenborgh.”
“That they would no longer be happy and would live separately is simply not true. That it may have been an administrative way that this was stated in the will and that nothing was done about it, that may be of course. But it is not the case that it is now certain that she and André broke up. Of course they weren’t.”
Oops, after Royce de Vries, Guido also seems not so sure about Rachel’s case. Or as Dyantha puts it: “You can say that you have seen them very happy, but there will also be people who say: ‘Yes, but this is what it says in the papers.’”
Statement
Rachel’s statement:
