Just another source that says absolutely nothing that you didn’t already know.
Of course, you have to go first to AV before you get someone new.
LV: Guerreiro, Schulz, Rothe
RV: Ryerson, Wolf, Meunier, Passlack
“should” go, Schulz, Meunier.
Passlack sure.
Guerreiro if extended, which I absolutely hope … will probably be replaced by Bensebaini (unfortunately) as LV and then commute between LV and ZM. Possibly even all the way back to his LA position .. good ol Caen/Lorient times.
Meunier and Schulz with the XXL salaries without game shares, of course you have to sell them or cancel the contract so that there is room for other people again.
Ryerson commutes between RV and LV anyway.
Unfortunately, without a sale, there is no space
Now stop with your constant “dissolve contract”, a player would have to agree and that’s not so easy…
Not only would the player in question have to be paid the outstanding salary in one fell swoop (why should he be satisfied with less), no, the player would also lose his right to professional training and medical care from the club….
So why would a player agree to such an option to their detriment?
??? Are you doing well?
What to cancel my permanent contract? This is the first time I’ve written anything about canceling a contract in almost 2 years And with Schulz, in the last year of his contract, it’s been in discussion for a little longer next season, since he doesn’t play a sporting role.
Even if you’re acting like Schulz’s advisor, Schulz himself wants to continue playing football, at least I don’t think he wants to stop, and another season without playing practice, especially at this age, doesn’t necessarily bring you much more if you then do yours have an XXL contract.
If he doesn’t earn anything after that.
It is not the case that Schulz suddenly only gets €500.00, especially since a contract termination also gives you the remaining salary and the freedom to look for a club where you can play football again far away from the media.
So I have no idea what you want me to read, but neither do I often write about Schulz and certainly not about the termination of contracts. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that it’s a possibility for this summer.
I’m fine, thank you very much…
I really don’t care about Schultz per se, but when I hear such nonsense about contract termination, my crest swells… BVB gave him his contract, BVB has to fulfill it… typical case of bad luck, he would have had struck, fans would complain if he didn’t want to extend it.
You shouldn’t have missed the fact that in recent years more and more players have been insisting on keeping their contracts and they don’t care whether they’re sitting on the bench, some club will also take him free of charge and contract next year , you have to let him train professionally and with 5-6 million more in the account it’s nice to live…
The only thing you get if you unilaterally terminate your employment contract without cause is a summons to appear before the labor court
Mister derryman makes a catastrophic contribution here. That’s wild.
Where please did the user formulate some of your fantasies here? Terminating the contract would of course be an option should Schulz agree. And yes, of course he would then get 1/2-3/4 of his contract. Ok, the thought of signing a new contract straight away. So nothing with no professional training and no health insurance. LOL dude what a shit some people say.
Of course, if the market is so unbelievably bad for Schulz that he can’t get even 1/4 of his money anywhere without risk, of course he won’t do it. And if he likes the role as an absolute chill without pressure, of course he doesn’t do that either.
But from his point of view it can of course make a lot of sense at his age that he has as much play as possible every year, otherwise almost nobody will take him next year.
So it can be both. For bvb it would of course be a chance to save a little money, but above all to reduce the training group.
Of course, that’s only possible if Schulz joins in, and if he doesn’t, bvb won’t do anything bad either. Then Schulz stays.
But what you fire out and assume… wild
What am I getting out?
It seems obvious that some grown-ups imagine a contract termination as easy as in the football manager…
Even the idea that someone is satisfied with 1/2 to 2/3 of the salary to which they are entitled is rather childishly naïve…
In the Bundesliga there is only potential interest from clubs in the Augsburg, Hertha or Schalke class anyway, the train has already left for Schulz anyway and in the USA or Turkey it hardly matters whether he waits another year or not …
Why should he now simply agree to a contract termination? So that Dortmund has to train fewer players? Can’t he care how many people are on the training ground as long as he’s one of them?
And before we start with ominous training groups 2, these have already been banned by the courts because they do not offer the professionals the professional training scope they are entitled to. In theory, he could train in the U-23, but only if he gets a place in the squad there…