Three days before the elections in Santa Fethe temperature of the general elections increased after various complaints of United to Change Santa Fe (the local seal that represents Together for Change) against the government of Omar Perotti.
The first of the opposition’s complaints, which was presented to the Electoral Court, has to do with a promoted video that appeared on social networks. There you see the image of Maximiliano Pullarothe most voted candidate for governor of the PASO, along with the candidate for deputy Amalia Granatadespite the fact that both leaders are in different political spaces.
According to what they read in Unidos, the search for associating both leaders has to do with the objective of the Government of subtract votes from Clara García, the socialist who heads the list of deputies of the opposition coalition. If García, widow of Miguel Lifschitz, has her votes dispersed, she could benefit from Perotti.
“Granata is not the candidate of our political force. They try to confuse the electorate and we believe that the campaign comes from the Government, to subtract votes from our candidate, who is Clara, so that Perotti can win,” Pullaro tells NOTICIAS. And he completes: “Make sure it doesn’t go wrong and the governor comes third.”
The evidence they presented from United to Change Santa Fe In electoral justice they are based on the fact that the company that paid for the advertising of the video is a supplier to the Santa Fe government and its owner, they say from that space, has a personal relationship with Perotti.
“How ugly that when someone is losing and resort to a trap”, Clara García protested to this chronicler. And then she added: “All roads point to Perotti’s team. The black money with which it is being paid, the company that acts as an intermediary for publication on networks, which is the same one that has published videos of a minister and videos of Perottiism’s campaign.
The confusion of a part of the electorate is possible in Santa Fe due to the use of unique ballots in each category. Hence the rapid reaction of the opposition to the event. However, the Electoral Tribunal did not responddespite the urgency of the presentation made to reduce advertising.
In the Gray House there was a lukewarm response regarding the accusation by Pullaro and his coalition. They said that they were not responsible, but they did not answer about the links they have with the company that promoted the false advertising on YouTube, Facebook and other networks.
Bags.
But the false campaign was not the only irregularity, in the run-up to the general elections on September 10. Provincial deputy Juan Cruz Cándido denounced that “within hours of the elections, the Perotti government decided to distribute 73 million so that friendly municipalities could buy bags.”
According to resolution 1417 that accompanies the legislator’s tweet, the Gray House gave municipalities and communes related to the government money to obtain votes. “Yes, bags for the elections. They will not be able to achieve with handouts what they did not do in the administration,” Cándido concluded.
A few days before the general elections, the temperature is red hot in Santa Fe. Based on the results of the PASO and subsequent polls, the gubernatorial election would seem to be resolved in favor of Pullaro. But all eyes are on deputies: whoever gets the most votes will have a majority in the lower house and the presidency of it. Perotti wants to occupy that place and disputes it with Clara García.
Image gallery
