DFL loses investor showdown – the clubs’ reactions

Club reactions

©IMAGO

With the abrupt cancellation of the billion-dollar deal with an investor, the German Football League has bowed to the fans in a test of strength. The DFL ended negotiations on Wednesday about the entry of a strategic partner to restore peace in the stadiums. The executive board of the umbrella organization of the 36 professional clubs decided unanimously in Frankfurt am Main not to continue talks with the financial investor CVC – and after the hoped-for deal fell through, it now has to find other sources of money in order to implement its modernization plans.

“Now I just had the feeling that there was no longer a majority. And then you no longer need to vote if you have that feeling. In any case, this process is now over,” said DFL supervisory board chairman Hans-Joachim Watzke to “ARD” and the TV channel “Sky”.

The spokesman for the fan umbrella organization Unser Kurve sees the stopped investor entry as a victory for the fans. “From the perspective of active football fans and all members of the clubs in Germany, this is of course a great success,” said Thomas Kessen to the “German Press Agency”. “Today is a good day for Germany’s football fans.”

Some clubs had recently suggested further votes. According to Watzke, general support crumbled in the 48 hours before the meeting. He then suggested that the Presidium end the negotiations. There had previously been weeks of protests in the 1st and 2nd leagues with tennis balls, remote-controlled cars and even small airplanes, and there was a threat of game cancellations. Ultimately, only CVC remained in the controversial bidding competition. CVC said: “No comment” on the DFL decision.

Boehly, Bin Salman & Co.: The owners of the Premier League clubs

Newcastle United – Mohammed Bin Salman (Saudi Arabia)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2021, as Chairman of the Public Investment Fund

Manchester United – Joel Glazer* (USA)

&copy IMAGO

*and family
Year of entry: 2003 | In December 2023, Jim Ratcliff bought 25% of the shares.

Chelsea FC – Todd Boehly (USA), Mark Walter (USA), Hansjörg Wyss (Switzerland)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2022 | Info: You can see the respective majority shareholders of the clubs here, who do not necessarily have to own 100% of the shares.

AFC Bournemouth – Bill Foley (USA)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2022

Nottingham Forest – Vangelis Marinakis (Greece)

&copy IMAGO

Year of entry: 2017

Fulham FC – Shahid Khan (USA/Pakistan)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2013

Everton FC – 777 Partners (pictured: founder Josh Wander)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2023

Aston Villa – Wes Edens (USA) & Nassef Sawiris (Egypt)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2018

Arsenal FC – Stan Kroenke (USA)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2008

Liverpool FC – John Henry (USA)

&copy IMAGO

Year of entry: 2010

West Ham United – David Sullivan (Wales), David Gold (England), Daniel Kretinsky (Czech Republic)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2010, Kretinsky from 2021

Brentford FC – Matthew Benham (England)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2011

Brighton & Hove Albion – Tony Bloom (England)

&copy IMAGO

Year of entry: 2009

Crystal Palace – Steve Parish (England)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2011

Manchester City – Mansour Al-Nahyan (UAE)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2008

Tottenham Hotspur – Daniel Levy (England)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2000
ENIC Sports and Development Holdings Limited holds 85.55% of Tottenham. Levy owns 29.4 percent of the company, Joe Lewis owns 70.6 percent. Levy is chairman of the club.

Wolverhampton Wanderers – Guo Guangchang (China)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2016

Burnley FC – Alan Pace (USA)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2020

Sheffield United – Abdullah Bin Mosaad Al Saud (Saudi Arabia)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2013
in the picture CEO Stephen Bettis and deputy chairman Yusuf Giansiracusa

Luton Town – Fan Consortium Luton Town FC 2020 Ltd (England)

&copy IMAGO

Starting year: 2008
Pictured is founding member and CEO David Wilkinson

“German professional football is in the midst of a test,” admitted Watzke, who is managing director of Borussia Dortmund, in a DFL statement. He also justified the executive committee’s decision by saying that sporting competition had suffered due to the frequent interruptions of the games.

DFL investor deal collapsed: This is how the Bundesliga clubs react

VfB Stuttgart welcomed “this understandable decision by the DFL executive committee, which allows all of us who love football to come together again.” Managing director Thomas E. Herrich of second division club Hertha BSC called the step the right decision in the overall situation. What will now be crucial is how the DFL and its clubs will align themselves in the future and what long-term objectives will be agreed upon that can sustainably strengthen the leagues. Watzke announced discussions about this.

Transfermarkt interview: Fürth's sports director Azzouzi on the fan protests

Transfermarkt interview: Fürth’s sports director Azzouzi on the fan protests

Werder Bremen managing director Klaus Filbry said: “In the current situation, this is the right decision for me. The entire system was at risk due to the game interruptions in the last few weeks.” Augsburg’s managing director Michael Ströll said: “The decision was certainly not made lightly, but we are convinced that, taking all the circumstances into account, it is the right and expedient in the current situation. “

Oke Göttlich, member of the DFL executive committee and president of second division leaders FC St. Pauli, called for the skepticism of many fans about investor models to be taken seriously. Protests were also part of democratic decisions. Göttlich also praised the protests of his own fans: “We experienced peaceful and creative expressions of opinion at the Millerntor. This helped a lot to promote the credibility of the popular sport of football, including within the DFL.”

Public pressure from civil society can also stop big money. For us this is an occasion for joy.

The Faszination Fankurve alliance also stated that the protests were now crowned with success. The citizens’ movement Finanzwende, which recently launched a petition, spoke of good news for all football fans. “Public pressure from civil society can also stop big money. For us, this is an occasion for joy,” said managing director Daniel Mittler in a statement. The recent exit of the US company Blackstone was celebrated as a success by fans who are against an investor.

The DFL wanted to collect 1 billion euros from a financial investor for a percentage share of the TV revenue; such a model should no longer exist. “This process has been shelved. We have to start all over again,” said Watzke, also with a view to better marketing the league abroad.

DFL boss Watzke primarily wants orderly games in the Bundesliga

A first attempt to attract an investor last year did not find the required majority among the clubs. In December, the necessary two-thirds majority was only just achieved. Due to the controversial role of Hanover managing director Martin Kind, there is suspicion that the vote could have violated the 50+1 rule. The rule limits the influence of external donors on clubs in the 1st and 2nd leagues.

Player salaries 2023: Bayern crack 300 million – Man Utd only in 8th place

20 | Sevilla FC | Wage costs: €135 million

&copy TM/IMAGO

Previous year: €138 million (-2%)
To the club profile!
(Source: UEFA financial report)

19 | RB Leipzig | Wage costs: €145 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €126 million (+15%)
To the club profile!

18 | Everton FC | Wage costs: €147 million

&copy IMAGO

Information only available from 2022
To the club profile!

17 | Newcastle United | Wage costs: €171 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €163 million (+5%)
To the club profile!

16 | Aston Villa | Wage costs: €172 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €121 million (+41%)
To the club profile!

15 | Leicester City | Wage costs: €174 million

&copy IMAGO

Information only available from 2022
To the club profile!

14 | Inter Milan | Wage costs: €176 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €201 million (-12%)
To the club profile!

13 | Borussia Dortmund | Wage costs: €183 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €164 million (+12%)
To the club profile!

12 | Arsenal FC | Wage costs: €188 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €182 million (+4%)
To the club profile!

11 | Atlético Madrid | Wage costs: €190 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €195 million (-2%)
To the club profile!

10 | Tottenham Hotspur | Wage costs: €205 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €179 million (+15%)
To the club profile!

9 | Juventus Turin | Wage costs: €225 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €297 million (-24%)
To the club profile!

8 | Manchester United | Wage costs: €249 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €337 million (-26%)
To the club profile!

7 | Liverpool FC | Wage costs: €304 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €309 million (-2%)
To the club profile!

6 | FC Bayern | Wage costs: €308 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €274 million (+13%)
To the club profile!

5 | Real Madrid | Wage costs: €320 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €462 million (-31%)
To the club profile!

4 | Chelsea FC | Wage costs: €323 million

&copy IMAGO

Information only available from 2022
To the club profile!

3 | Manchester City | Wage costs: €389 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €321 million (+21%)
To the club profile!

2 | FC Barcelona | Wage costs: €505 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €347 million (+45%)
To the club profile!

1 | Paris Saint Germain | Wage costs: €529 million

&copy IMAGO

Previous year: €626 million (-16%)
To the club profile!

Watzke now stated that it should not be overlooked that this vote lacked broad acceptance due to the events surrounding Hannover 96. “Given the great asset we hold in our hands with the 50+1 rule, ignoring this should not be our approach. The DFL Presidium is unanimous in its support of the 50+1 rule.”

Any new vote would raise further legal questions about the assessment of the decision made in December, Watzke added. “Avoiding this and returning to orderly gaming operations must be the DFL’s primary goal.” Hanover’s club management had instructed Kind to vote against the investor’s involvement. However, the voting results and the public confessions of those opposing the proposal suggest that the 79-year-old voted yes and thus helped the DFL plan gain the necessary majority. Child himself does not comment on his vote.

To home page

ttn-38