Criticism after Adana Demirspor – Trabzonspor match If you play in slow motion

Against an opponent like Adana Demirspor, who has both team balance and fast attack, if you don’t press in the front area and you don’t apply counter-pressing where you lose, it was inevitable that you will score a goal and give a position. If a two striker game was to be preferred, Abdülkadir Ömür should have been preferred on the left line in the starting 11, not Bardhi. Bakasetas should have been positioned close to the opponent’s goal, not the playmaker, in front of the defense, as they would change places on the flanks with Trezeguet. This was an indication that the formation would not work on the field in terms of gameplay.



As a matter of fact, Trabzonspor could not produce many positions, and gave many positions to its opponent in the first half. Again in the second half it was not right for Hamsik and Bakasetas to play in the center of the midfield. Because in the second goal, Demirspor could not prevent the offensive pass of Demirspor in a defensive sense, and the fact that two heavy defenders Bartra and Hugo could not take the correct position was an important factor. Bordeaux-blue people made an invitation to Adana Demirspor, with the appearance of being sloppy throughout the defense and unable to take the right position, by making mistakes throughout the game.



Trabzonspor goes back every game, every week instead of putting it on. Not just in terms of gameplay, but also mentally. This is also very clear. There is formlessness not only in the team, but also in Abdullah Avcı. And the biggest problem is that they do not have a common language in terms of play in attack and defense.




ttn-7