Our way of understanding a conflict usually depends on the perception of good and bad. But in the outbreak of violence in Sudan It is difficult to resolve the dilemma, the two sides in the conflict have as much to blame as there are arguments to place them on one side or the other. The two opposing generals were committed to leading the country towards a civil democracy. Following the protests of the majority of the population to end more than three decades of the authoritarian regime of Omar Al Bashir, the military seized power. Abdel Fattah Burhan he was left with control of the Army and the Government; Mohamed Hamdan Dagalowith its quick support forces, an elite unit created to massacre the rebel population in Darfur two decades ago and protect the president, was left with the gold mines and access to oil. While fighting among themselves, the Sudanese meanwhile are going to experience another period of violence and uncertainty.
Keep reading….