“I think that to be together you have to agree to be Together for Change, and you have to agree on common political objectives. That seems to have broken. Like many, I feel a deep sadness because Together for Change, like the PRO, was the result of many years of work by many people. Obviously this is not the Together for Change of 2015, nor the PRO of 2013, and we will have to accept it. And it will depend on the lucidity of our leaders to recompose what can be recomposed, or get divorced,” he warns and regrets. Pablo Avellutoformer Minister of Culture.
“The use of the homeland, as a concept that must be defended, which Patricia Bullrich and Luis Petri are using, is clearly imitating the models of Kirchnerism. I do not agree with that, it is a choice, the homeland in Argentina will continue to exist. It is a strategy, but it seems quite obsolete to me and goes against our values and principles,” added Avelluto, editor of “Primer Tiempo” and “Para qué,” the books by Mauricio Macri, manager of the pact with Javier Milei.
“For me Sergio Massa and Javier Milei are exactly the same, we got tired of saying until last week that Milei was Massa, but now it turns out that he is the savior of the country. So we were lying before or we are lying now. I respect all positions, but there are those of us who think that neither of the two is better. The best thing is that those who are convinced that one or the other are better are the ones who express themselves in the election, and the rest of us will vote blank. I hope there are many blank votes because that is a signal that whoever wins will have to listen to,” the former minister declared, marking his position.
“I I do not accept any moral extortion, that if I vote blank, I am supporting this one or that one. We would have won the elections for that. Instead of raising these things we should be reflecting on why we lost. Being Milei’s caboose doesn’t seem like my position to me. “I got into politics to combat authoritarianism,” she remarked.
“It seems to me that Mauricio Macri is a sincere and transparent person, every time he avoided questioning Milei in the campaign, when it was the result of the PASO and he said that the change had won, and he always considered that Milei was part of the family of change,” Avelluto acknowledged, noting that the former president’s strategy was always clear.
“The internal of Together for Change was very extreme, but then the campaign strategy was very bad. The discourse of order seemed very limited. And then there were facts that I didn’t share at all. This thing about not congratulating the winners seemed horrible to me, because whoever wins represents millions of Argentines who did not vote for you. On the other hand, the end of the campaign specified that this is a battle to the death against Kirchnerism, It seems very undemocratic to me.because our objective is not to eliminate Kirchnerism from the face of the earth, it is to win the election, that is democracy,” concluded the former minister in dialogue with El Disparador (Delta 90.3).
by RN
Image gallery
