Thus states cornelia b: “Unfortunately, a human life is and will come to an end and that is nature, that’s how it should be. Sure, doctors want to make their patients better, but should they also strive for eternal life? Think that if someone gets sick who needs an organ transplant that this is natural selection, as terrible as that is. If everyone lived indefinitely, the world would burst at the seams and let’s not play God.”
In contrast, says teenandander precisely that it is good for medical progress: ‘Animals are made to be eaten, humans too, just put them unarmed in Africa with the lions and tigers, I guarantee that their turn will be fairly quick.
Then you can also use some items from an animal for medical progress, if you remove the items painlessly and take the remains to the butcher, there is nothing wrong with that. Most of the complainers throw another steak on the plate tonight. There is nothing more hypocritical than a human being.”
But transplanting animal organs into humans is also possible adaottehundreds much too far. She wonders: “Do we want all of this? Saving lives by means of a transplant often means prolonging suffering. And if the patient is still young, he can also reproduce because everything should be possible, but it is a disaster for posterity.” Bjorn BdR adds even more: “Disgusting if you are going to kill animals to save a person.”
