Johnny de Mol states that Angela de Jong has written such a destructive column about him because his editors have canceled her. “That sometimes seems to work therapeutically.”
A very striking swipe from Johnny de Mol: he puts down one of his criticasters, namely Opinion Diva Angela de Jong, as an extremely resentful woman. The ad-tiger shark yesterday delivered a very critical column about the presenter and according to the billionaire son that is pure from Rancune. His editors had canceled her just before.
Turmoil
Studiogast Jelte van der Goot brings up the sturdy column of Angela The Oranjezomer From yesterday evening: “There was a decent spicy column in the newspaper about your show this morning.”
The column of the head is indeed not lying about it: “I am no longer annoyed, as a viewer you can only feel deeply sorry for Johnny de Mol.” What among other things? “If a prize is created for the worst talk show host, Johnny will win him brilliantly.”
Johnny Pissig
Jelte’s front appears to be agreed work, because Johnny then goes wild on Angela. “Well, you can say that, yes. You mean Angela de Jong? Yes, he was tough again and it is not the first time she does. I have to say very much: she is not always wrong, isn’t it? We all make mistakes and I might make a little more than the other.”
“Of course we are working very hard with a team and I want to take responsibility for the things that are not going well, so sometimes she has a point, but I think she was a bit pissed off, because she would actually be here tonight. There was only a lot of America news, so Raymond (Mens, ed.), Then we wanted you at the table.”
At the bar
Angela was then canceled. “We had asked her from:” Do you want to sit at the bar? ” She didn’t want to get rid of that for half an hour after that.
Then Raymond says: “Well, I don’t see her to write it off in half an hour very badly, don’t you think? Or do you really think so?”
Timeline
Johnny thinks it is from resentment. “Well, in terms of timeline it was right, so I think so.”
Sidekick Olcay Gulsen: “I thought: she must have already written that column.”
Raymond: “That seemed to me too.”
Olcay: “And that she could talk about this at the table. Actually a bit what Victor Vlam did in a podcast and it was then put at the bar, right? He then also commented on the show that he thought it was boring, Victor?”
Johnny: “Yes, that’s right in the beginning and then he was there a week later. This is very coincidental that it is just on this … half an hour later, anyway? But well, The show must go onguys. “
What does Victor say?
TV connoisseur Victor Vlam thinks Johnny is next to it. He says X: “I don’t believe that Angela from Rancune has written a critical column about Johnny. She has worked for a long time to prove her integrity. Why would you throw that to grab that because of one silly performance?”
He continues: “Is it a bit petty that Angela did not want at the bar? Yes, did that.
And what does Tina Nijkamp think? The TV authority is on her analysis canal No party and only notes: “Well, this is probably being prosecuted.”

