Ali Gültiken made evaluations about Beşiktaş Antalyaspor match

There’s a difference between playing a system and playing well. High-level teams can play all systems, but for this the team must be at a high level. System change is always dangerous in times of trouble or if you have missing players. This preference caused Beşiktaş to be ineffective in the game for 75 minutes. Both the game was lost and the players could not be included in the system. There is struggle, but there is no activity.

If you look at ‘We finished without giving a position in our castle’, you might think that there is a positive side to the job. But that’s no consolation after a game you didn’t win at home. If Beşiktaş’s club had played a match against the 11 on the field, the club would have won. After Ghezzal, Larin, Güven, Josef and Oğuzhan entered the game, Beşiktaş moved a little more. He was able to reveal the tempo he wanted and wanted a little more in this section.

According to this match, they have also captured a considerable amount of positions. If the motivation for the last shot had been better, these would have been enough for Beşiktaş to win the match. Here, apart from what Beşiktaş did or could not do about the game, there is a position that affects the score in the match. It is not possible to accept the situation as normal when the ball that goes to the goal hits the opponent’s arm during Güven’s headshot. Come on, the middle referee didn’t see it, it’s really hard to understand why VAR is no longer involved in a position to score directly.

ttn-7

Bir yanıt yazın