2 remarks:
1. Are those responsible in Freiburg under no obligation to protect or improve the image and reputation of SC Freiburg?
2. As I already thought, there will apparently be the first wheat beer shower for Nagelsmann in Munich after the Dortmund game. I think this is the best time.
Two comments on your comments:
(1) Every board member has this obligation – and Freiburg are not the first to fail in this task in the eyes of some observers.
For example, the Basic Law PK was classified by 90% of those interested in football as a maximum embarrassment, and yet KHR and UH would certainly hold the same PK again, simply because it also had a benefit.
It’s the same in Freiburg now – especially since the waiver of the objection/protest might have had legal consequences for the Freiburg board of directors in the future.
I had no doubts that the appeal would be dismissed, to do otherwise would have been complete nonsense.
However, I would have wished that the sports court would set limits, up to which period of time an additional player is still tolerable at which score and from when it becomes behavior contrary to sport and worthy of sanctions.
And I wish even more that the rules of procedure would be changed in such a way that the DFB would take action itself in such cases, instead of washing their hands in innocence and waiting for objections.
(2) It was clear before the season that Nagelsmann would bathe in wheat beer.
Exactly when that takes place is of no interest to anyone outside of the FC Bayern atmosphere – and whether you think you’re giving BVB a hand by taking a shower isn’t either.
The championship is granted to you, but not being first with the squad would be just as disappointing as with PSG.
In any case, your tip is just as unnecessary as one or the other aluminum hat comment here. 