The decisions of the Arbitration Board were announced. Galatasaray’s objection to the appointment of a foreign referee in the decision was rejected.
Here is the statement made by TFF:
At the meeting of the TFF Arbitration Board dated February 21, 2025 (12), he examined the files on the agenda and made the following decisions.
1.
E.2024/478 – K.2025/95 Erzurum Sports Football Club’s Dispute Resolution Board for the dispute between Alanya Sports Club and the decision of E.2024/262 – K.2024/372 dated 29.08.2024 and numbered E.2024/372. As a result of the negotiation; Since it was understood that there was no direction in the decision of the dispute resolution board, there was no contrary to the procedure and the basis, with the rejection of the application. Appointment of the decision,
unanimously, 2.
E.2024/556 – K.2025/96 Zonguldak Kömür Sportif Services Inc.’s objection to the decision of the Dispute Resolution Board regarding the dispute between the football player Yusuf Yıldız and the decision of E.2024/497- K.2024/563 was examined. As a result of the negotiation; Since it was understood that there was no direction in the decision of the dispute resolution board, there was no contrary to the procedure and the basis, with the rejection of the application. Appointment of the decision,
unanimously, 3.
E.2025/17 – K.2025/97
Bayburt Special Provincial Administration Sports Club’s football player Görkem Can Güner and the dispute Resolution Board of the dispute between 19.11.2024 dated 19.11.2024 and E.2024/629 – K.2024/664 objection was examined. As a result of the negotiation; To be specified in the reasoned decision,
– In the evaluation section of the 100.000,00 TL, which is examined and decided under the title of the bonus receivable in the case, was written as 10.000,00 TL as a result of the material error, but the bonus receivable in question is 100.000,00 TL; In the relevant part of the receivable decision of the receivables in the relevant part of the “100.000,00 TL” as the correction, unanimously, unanimously, – The partial acceptance of the defendant’s objection and the detailed decision will receive a total of 147.317,50 TL per match; 42.856,00 TL from 25.03.2024, 42.856,00 TL from 28.04.2024, 61.605,50 TL is determined by the date of the interest start date of the interest start date 05.08.2024 to be corrected,
unanimously, 4.
E.2025/58 – K.2025/98 Arnavutköy Municipality Football Sports Club’s football player Onat Kutay Kurt and the dispute resolution Board of the dispute between 21.11.2024 dated and E.2024/634 – K.2024/679 objection was examined. As a result of the negotiation; Since it was understood that there was no direction in the decision of the dispute resolution board, there was no contrary to the procedure and the basis, with the rejection of the application. Appointment of the decision,
unanimously, 5.
E.2025/129– K.2025/99
In the application of Galatasaray A.Ş. dated 20.02.2025; Trendyol Super League Shamil Ekinci season will be played in the 25th week Galatasaray A.Ş. – Fenerbahçe A.Ş. In the meeting dated 12.02.2025 and numbered 31 of the TFF Board of Directors regarding the management of the competition by the foreign arbitrator, the objection to the appointment of a foreign arbitrator to the Central Arbitration Board and the appointment of a foreign arbitrator was examined. As a result of the negotiation; – In the examination of the TFF Board of Directors’ decision in terms of unlawfulness; Since it is understood that there is no direction contrary to the procedure, the basis and the instructions. reject of the objection,
unanimously, – Trendyol Super League Shamil Ekinci season of the Central Referee Board will be played in the 25th week of Galatasaray A.Ş. – Fenerbahçe A.Ş. The request for the cancellation of the transaction regarding the appointment of a foreign arbitrator in the competition; Article 2 of the TFF Arbitration Board Instruction entitled “Judicial Judiciary of the Board” and the judicial authority of the Arbitration Board was determined, the order regulation of the instruction was determined in a limited number of the decisions that may be objected, and the decision was not within the jurisdiction of the Board.rejecting the objection in terms of procedures
with a majority of votes, 6.
E.2025/130 – K.2025/100
The objection of Philip Gameli Awuku, the footballer of Şanlıurfa Sports Club, to the decision of PFDK dated 18.02.2025 and numbered E.2024-2025/768-K.2024-2025/977. As a result of the negotiation; – Şanlıurfa Sports Club footballer Philip Gameli Awuku’nun opponent team football player due to the violent movement of FDT 43 and 35/4. in accordance with its articles Men from 3 official competitions and a fine of 29.250,00 TL Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of legal qualification and determination of the punishment in the decision of punishment with him, with the rejection of the application Appointment of the decision,
unanimously, 7.
E.2025/131 – K.2025/101
Alagöz Holding Iğdır Football Club’s footballer Volan Ethemi’s decision of PFDK dated 18.02.2025 and numbered E.2024-2025/761-K.2024-2025/970 was examined. As a result of the negotiation; – Alagöz Holding Iğdır Football Club Footballer Volan Ethemi’nin Fourth Referee for the fourth referee FDT’nin 41/1-A and 35/4. in accordance with its articles Men from 3 official competitions and a fine of 29.250,00 TL Since it was understood that there was no inaccuracy in terms of legal qualification and determination of the punishment in the decision of punishment with him, with the rejection of the application Appointment of the decision,
The rejection of the postponement request, unanimously, 8.
E.2025/132 – K.2025/102 In the application of Galatasaray A.Ş. dated 21.02.2025; Trendyol Super League Shamil Ekinci season will be played in the 25th week Galatasaray A.Ş. – Fenerbahce A.Ş. As a result of the negotiation made by the Central Arbitration Board to appoint a foreign arbitrator by the Central Arbitration Board to the TFF Board of Directors on 20.02.2025, the request for cancellation was rejected and the request of the TFF Board of Directors regarding the cancellation of the decision was examined; Since there is no direction contrary to the law and the instructionsrejecting demand
unanimously,
Decided.
TFF Arbitration Board
ttn-7