Since the Government decided to move the first token of the year, with the request for impeachment that Alberto Fernandez made about the Supreme Court on January 1, the expectation is set on what will be the response of the highest court of Justice.
In February the four courtiers met again at the courthouse and they began to weave what will be a 2023 full of twists and turns. In Pink House They study their movements and the government of Horacio Rodriguez Larreta wait for a reaction, but the overlords will slowly digest the advanced K. The Court only speaks through its rulings. And they have a lot to say.
The first reaction of the highest court of Justice would be in response to the proposals for annulment and challenge that the Nation made to avoid complying with the ruling on co-participating funds with CABA. But the matter will not end there: there are key cases awaiting sentencing and that could further complicate the situation court of Cristina Kirchner. That is why in an interview with El Destape, the director of Legal Affairs of the Senate, Graciana Peñafort, warned: “Controversial rulings are going to come. More adverse sentences will come”. Kirchnerism can only expect bad news if the Court decides to carry out its revenge.
Kickback
After the judicial fair, Horacio Rosatti, Juan Carlos Maqueda, Carlos Rosenkrantz and Ricardo Lorenzetti They met again on the fourth floor of the courthouse. The first days were for holding bilateral meetings where the agenda for a particular year began to be woven, crossed by the elections. They fixed the first meeting of agreements for Thursday the 9th. There could appear definitions on co-participation. On that same date, the deputies of the commission that accuses the supreme, will vote on the admissibility or not of the impeachment. It will be a day of maximum boiling in the three powers of the State.
In the first part of the year, the highest body of Justice would add to the definition of the execution of co-participating funds, the conclusion on who are the senators who will be part of the Council of the Magistracy. It is that Kirchnerism wanted to put Martin Donate with a controversial maneuver and the courtiers will decide whether or not to take the oath. Each of these definitions would mean a new cross against the Front of All.
But there is also a special chapter with Cristina: they already have the Future Dollar file to decide whether to leave the dismissal of the vice firm or reopen the case. In Kirchnerism, this case is not too worrying: they are attentive to the future of Hotesur-Los Sauces, which is currently in Cassation and could soon reach the hands of Rosatti and company.
They will also have to rule on the legality or otherwise of the double pension that Cristina charges. One as former president and another for Néstor’s term, which add up to more than six million pesos per month. In the opposition they doubt the legality of the matter.
In the corridors of the Court, the situation into which politics dragged them is carefully analyzed. After the media pressure to which they were subjected, if they rule in favor of the Government they will tell them that they twisted their arm and if, on the contrary, they rule against it again, they will ensure that it is part of the judicial war. Each file is a double-edged sword.
advanced K
Kirchnerism points to the wear effect. They know that the ultimate goal of the project to remove the Supreme Court is impossible to execute. But they are betting on spoiling the image of the highest court with the impeachment: “Important things are going to appear: there are very well-kept secrets,” shot the Buenos Aires judge Juan Ramos Padilla v. Court. And he completed, in statements to Radio 10: “You can find out what happens with the ‘anticyclical funds’ that they manage and you don’t know where they are.”
The impeachment treatment began on the last Thursday of January and continued a week later. Beyond the favorable opinion that the commission can obtain, where the ruling party has a majority, the search will be to summon the courtiers and their relatives to expose them to a battery of questions. The problem with the plan is that the defendants do not have the obligation to attend and, it is known, they have already made the decision not to do so.
Meanwhile, the attorney Treasure, Carlos Zannini, expanded the challenge “for reasons of decorum” against the courtiers, after the leak of chats that link to Silvio Roblesright hand of Rosatti, with the former Buenos Aires Minister of Justice Marcelo D’Alessandro. The Government wants co-judges to be chosen to review the cause of co-participation.
For the pressure to leave the limits of Congress, social and union organizations close to the Frente de Todos They held a march on Wednesday, February 1. They gathered in Plaza Lavalle, in front of the Palace of Justice, under the slogan “out with the judicial mafia.” It also had small replicas in different cities of the country: even in Santa Fe, Rosatti’s place of origin.
In court they lower the price of the dispute. In an election year, they are confident that they will soon be out of the limelight. They measure every word because they understand that they will have to be extremely timing so as not to fall into the trap into which the government insists on leading them.
Image gallery
