It was part of the soundtrack of the 70s: “To unwire, to unwire, that the land is ours, it is yours and that…”. The word ‘unwire‘ is not found in the dictionary, although the imagination endows it with meaning. Huge estates of wealthy masters and exploited peasants. ‘Unwire’ is to rip the wires of misery and despotism, is a call to solidarity, to social justice… “The land, for those who work it & rdquor ;, Emiliano Zapata had shouted decades before.
The echo of that cry resounds in the memory of the left. The land as a space of struggle and resistance. Until, in the magnificent film ‘As beasts’, we find a scene that blows up the imagination of the previous century: “Every time I get up at five in the morning, I remember you, and that’s where another ‘beautiful’ day begins& rdquor;, says the villain of the movie. A day of sacrifice and misery that has only one chance for improvement: selling his land to a renewable energy company. In front of him, a Frenchman who wants to build a bucolic sustainable paradise and who refuses to sell, making it impossible to deal with the company. At last, a new class struggle.
Related news
We can talk about the rural world, but also about the placement of solar panels in homes or the purchase of electric cars. Valuable options for the ecological transition, but inaccessible to those with a lower income level. There are aids, of course. And it is good and necessary that they exist. Another thing is that they do not stop being interpreted as privileges for those who see these products from the climatic barrier -the wire fence-. Your old, polluting car is more expensive, which reduces your ability to save and, finally, the chances of buying an electric one.
The universal health wave public education They are mainstays of the discourse of the left and, clearly, they benefit the most disadvantaged. react to climate emergency it is also key to the common good, but it entails sacrifices for those who are already making too many. Perhaps for the first time in history, progressive discourse clashes with the needs of the most vulnerable. A contradiction difficult to digest. Not only is it essential to work so that the bill for the ecological transition does not fall on the weakest, but it is also necessary to build a discourse that does not reduce them to the role of villains, of intolerance… far-right voters. For social justice, and for responsibility and coherence of the left.