40 million? Schalke can only smile tiredly about it. It’s nice that action is being taken against insolvent clubs in the neighboring country.
Sure, we are in debt to the banks and our members… BUT… apart from the value we have in land and buildings, we pay our obligations! And that’s exactly what distinguishes us from many others and in this case this club!
If you just wanted to hit a dim spell, you succeeded.
Maybe you also carried some away with your “humor”. But it shows me that there are still people with energy-saving bulbs who think they have enlightenment.
GbY the doc
Sorry but… Guarantee from the country of 30 million.
Previously, in 2019, a guarantee of over 35 million.
It’s also clear that if the store drowns, the coal from 19 will also be sunk, so the cadaver will continue to be given forced ventilation.
Have nothing against Schalke. Have sympathy. Without taxpayers, however, the association would have gone bankrupt long ago. Debts to the bank, to the members! At the taxpayer. Terrific!
I don’t even know where to start with so much ignorance.
1. Schalke has no debt. But liabilities that could all be paid so far. That’s a major difference. Try to understand the difference between debt and liability. Maybe then you’ll notice something. However, based on your post, I have my doubts. So owing to the bank is wrong. Likewise with the members. Maybe the keyword will help you: due date of a liability. Try to find out what a bond is. Maybe you’ll learn something else.
2. Debt to the taxpayer is the next stupid statement. The state of North Rhine-Westphalia transferred exactly 0 euros to Schalke. Do you even know what a bond is? Your post shows you have no idea. Such incredibly stupid nonsense. Here, too, I strongly recommend that you take a look at what a guarantee is.
And before you come here with weird accusations: Your statements are stupid. Not you. I can’t judge that (so I don’t know if you’re stupid or not) but only evaluate your statements. And they are incredibly stupid.
On the topic: I’m not in Girondis. Since it is almost normal that many reports cannot tell debts and liabilities apart, I cannot say whether the 40 million are really debts. With such a decision (quasi forced relegation) it really seems to be debt or you can’t guarantee that the new season can be financed. In the Bundesliga it often happens that playing rights are granted subject to certain conditions. Does anyone know if it’s the same in the French league? To be honest, I don’t really know. Example: Last season, Schalke was only allowed to play under certain conditions. These were fulfilled and you could master the season in Liga2. (There were no restrictions this season). If that’s not possible in the French league, then I’m really curious if there can be a complaint against it. I would definitely take action if I were in their place. You can’t do more than lose. Maybe you can also raise the deficit. However, the point in time at which the conditions must be fulfilled would be decisive for this. If that is after the deadline, it will be difficult.
I don’t deal much with the French league but wasn’t the club more of a top club? what happened there?