The tenant has been living in the house since January 10, 2023. On April 17, agents visited around 5.30 pm. “We met two women of Brazilian descent and a man (customer),” the agents wrote in their official reports. “Women dressed scantily. Multiple condoms, lubricant and paper around the bed. Temperature in the home very high.”
Strange men
They also wrote that it might be a subletting by the resident. Local residents would have seen that ‘off and on strange men go inside and out’ and there would have been ‘all kinds of indications’ for illegal prostitution. Eigen Haard spoke with the resident on May 7, 2025 and asked him to leave, but he refused.
The tenant also denied that he subled the property or gave others to others for business prostitution. His ex-girlfriend would be responsible for the incident on April 17, something that he would be very shocked. Moreover, he would have a great interest in keeping the home, partly because of the difficult time with psychological problems he has had.
Anonymous report
The subdistrict court judge sets the verdict That an evacuation in this case is not proportional. According to the subdistrict court judge, there is not sufficient substantiation by Eigen Haard that there has been prostitution and nuisance for a long time. For example, in addition to the police report, there is only one anonymous report of a local resident, while nine local residents have submitted statements to support the tenant and to show that he actually lives there himself.
Furthermore, the judge also sees the man as a ‘vulnerable tenant, for whom evacuation would have’ far -reaching consequences’. According to the subdistrict court, the chance that sex workers will be found again in the home seems very small.