No! What do we lose again in advertising for a player and that after we bought the only backup from his contract? That must be the ingenious transfer ideas of our sports director Sebastian Kehl … luckily our squad only punched our squad with quality and width …
Club legends or not why, can such a bottle make our transfers and what does it deserve the contract extension? Even the Bellingham Transfer apparently went to Watzke’s account.
Targeted congratulations to Leipzig for the (probable) commitment of a talented player with a lot of potential.
Honestly, can you only come online to complain? Slowly it annoys without end.
Such users like you would have come out and shouted loudly if the BVB had bought this Silva by 30 million because back up and so.
At Silva this is even the summit. The boy may have a little potential, but nowhere had a quota that I would have said “you have to do that”. Moukoko had better stats than this one.
All other players who you didn’t get so “gnawing” had just such a story why it didn’t work. Mcateee didn’t want to get out of England. Moore should only be awarded without KO. At Cherki, the disposing club did not want to. On the departure to Manchester you saw again that they did not follow the agreement. Jashari chose Milan at a prize that one would probably not have been with and Bakayoko would have been exactly 0.0 fit in the Kovac System.
The BVB squad needs 2 players for the new season. Sancho or Buonanotte. Both are played for temporary time because the price will press considerably. Which, by the way, is very smart. And another IV, then you can start the season without a headache.
So don’t stress yourself and even if nobody comes anymore, it is just that. If you don’t suit you, there are other clubs to support.
So if you were looking into my comments, then you would see that I have flopped larger transfers that have always defended a couto, or a Belligham. These were always interesting transfers on paper.
What I personally criticize is actually when money is picked up for players who do not match the talent development that is not called for re -proclaimed strategy. That was the last time when I had caught up with people here in the forum that an Anton had already maximized its potential, while a Huijsen has a lot more potential. Regardless of the fact that it was even cheaper at the time, I was strongly used to spend too much money on a talent at the time
So that is a completely unjustified assumption that I would complain about something like that, rather the other way around.
And no I don’t expect that we spend 30 million per player, among other things, the delivery of Rothe was incomprehensible to me if you have a talented option in the squad.
Mcateee and Buonanotte are interesting names in the slope, you can also add an Elliott and last year our interest in Archie Gray. Each of these players will probably go through the rags because of the English demands … My question: Why is there apparently 80% of our focus on these players? Everyone knew that McATEE would cost 35 million because there was always a crazy English association who pays it. Means if we were not ready anyway, why is our focus? Doesn’t make sense, right?
Cherki. Here you tell a half truth. Yes, the transfer was blocked, but part of the truth is that you tried to get the transfer a day before the end of the window because you tried to buy Cherki at the ridiculous price. Lyon would not need a substitute for his most important player. That was clear that they would not sell him without a replacement. Accordingly, a higher price was then mentioned in the opponent and it is simply not ready to negotiate and put it on being able to strike the next transfer window, a misjudgment as we all know now. And even there you could have obtained the removal early and searched for a replacement.
I am Bakayoko with you. I once commented, but because because of the quality of our and the lack of IVS in our squad, I strongly doubt that Kovac will stay with the triple chain in the long term (although I am gifted fan of 3 systems). I assumed this with the transfer, but never actively used myself for Bakayoko. But here I also have another question for you?
If you and I, both of whom are not involved in the football business, already know that Bakayoko does not fit into the system, why did Sebastian Kehl apparently put time and effort into the transfer? I don’t think the rumors that have existed for a year have been all 100% ducks. But should he also know that the player does not fit Sowl at Sahin and Kovac, or did we both decrypt the matrix here?
Jashari goes to Milan for 35 million … We would have had the money. Yes, it is a lot, but since we tried to substitute Alvarez with Can, we have an enormous problem on the 6th NMECHA regardless of its susceptibility to injuries, this defensive role does not fill out enough. Every team needs such players only we try for the prostitute in a row without somehow getting through and it is the big reason in addition to the IVs, why our defense has been incredibly bad for years, even though we have one of the best IVs with Schlotterbeck. You refuse the money and pay the price every year. At some point you have to be willing to take your money in your hand and if a transfer summer makes a minus, but the Champions League secures income, it is still a win.
Two transfers that you have forgotten and which I also criticize: Maatsen and Chukwuemeka. If you already know that you can’t pay the options, why are you writing them in? For someone like me from the business world, it’s just very bad management!
If you do not get Maaden for 40 million and with Bensbaini that you wanted to chase off the farm last year, why do you not keep at least Rothe as a backup but try to use Ryerson on the left ??? Fortunately, we landed a lucky hit with Svensson in winter, but wasn’t that not incredibly bad if you had a talented option in your own squad? Especially when there was no replacement?
That is my problem. It is not that Silva is coming or that he doesn’t come. But that at my club nobody really plans to see which profile is sought, what we need and who is in question in our price range. In football, the big clubs grab the players first, then the stragglers come. We are relatively high in the chopping order, why do we act like a nervous chicken and rush from name to name often without any reference to the system? It looks as if nobody has a plan of what is priority 1/2/3 and as if you only had a name for each position, without any idea what it will cost in the end, that is alien and stupid. If that makes me a hater because I find obvious planning errors frustrating and scary, I am probably a black painter.
And as the last example of point IV: I could give you 5-10 inexpensive options in Europe as a fan of Series A, Bundesliga and a little on the side, which we could have on the IV position for 10-25 million since the beginning of the transfer window. Each of them would have been an upgrade to a non -fit Süle, everyone would be young and talented, many would even offer playful added value. Now my question that seems to make me a hater. Why, as a fan of BVB, only hears from the one Argentinier and no other player on the radar ??? From a certain point in time, a good player who really comes, namely more value than a rumor about a super talent becomes out of nowhere.
I don’t expect Milan M price war to beat, but I expect the board to be communicated clearly: in these positions we needed and then the options processed one after the other. That is not too much required!