Just hours ago the marathon session ended in which Congress turned its back on Javier Milei with initiatives that, according to him, break the fiscal balance. As the senators before, now it was the deputies who put a brake on the chainsaw and forced him to recalculate his strategy in an electoral year, and with the surveys that show a decline in his image that the opposition still fails to capitalize.
The “Nido de Rats”, as Congress calls Milei, gives him bad news again. As well as the governors who claim the funds owed and say that it is thanks to them that the president achieves the celebrated surplus. A part of them, those of the so -called “federal shout”, they even have been planting in the electoral plane, with a view to putting their own candidates by 2027 that represents that new avenue of the medium that repudiates equally to the K and the libertarians.
Where he looks at him, in short, the policy is taking an invoice to an outsider as Milei who pretended, in the beginning, to take it on. What is left to do to the first president after this renovation of Desales? Sit down to negotiate, even with dissimulation. And for that he has a single official capable of putting on that role, Guillermo Francos, his chief of cabinet. It is the “moderate” within a Taliban government, which has already received the mission of fixing with the governors, placating the rebel congressmen and even “intervening” in the internal dispute of the Der Iron triangle after the sparks between Karina Milei and Santiago Caputo in the last lista closure. But it is not known if Franks, even with all his experience, does miracles. And the president requires one.
Even the allies are on the prowl. Mauricio Macri may validate unequal agreements by lists in the province and the city, but in the same way he is able to lower his thumb to an initiative of libertarians in the Senate or deputies, as already happened. Those who talk to the former president confess that, according to his vision, the Milei model “does not close”, and that the dollars of the IMF that arrived to help him in the prelude to the October elections could not perfectly not reach after that. Macri also raises the same question as the establishment: Will the government devalue after the elections? Do you have a back not to do it? What consequences would that decision bring?
Macri speaks for experience. He also won the mid -term elections in 2017 and then it was that “things happened” and the runs arrived and the defeat against Kirchnerism.
The sand watch runs. And the policy began to take an invoice to the man who calls her “caste.”
By Franco Lindner
