The episode of Angry (BNNVARA) about Dilan Yesilgöz was not about Dilan Yesilgöz. At least, not in the first instance. The episode was about threats from people who serve democracy for their work: journalists, scientists, judges and politicians. In Europe there is only more concrete threats to these people in Italy than in the Netherlands. But there it comes from organized crime.
Journalist Sinan Can, who frankly told his story about the impact that threats of threats received for nineteen years, warned: “If we look at the paving in the Netherlands, which we are all talking about, which we are all bothered by all: you should not underestimate it, this is not a child’s play.” It was a great, nuanced and harrowing episode that every teacher of social studies in the classroom should show. Were it not for the spokesperson for Dilan Yesilgöz to inform the team of angry that the VVD had received air from the theme of this episode: Safety! And so the VVD thought, we have to be here. But they shouldn’t have done that.
“You have made my life more unsafe here,” said Tim Hofman, pointing to the two -minute Minister of Justice and Security, in which Yesilgöz questioned Hofman’s journalistic integrity when he called on people to report after mistreatment by the police during a demonstration. Yesilgöz responded fiercely: “But you have made the life of those agents unsafe!” This is apparently this way at the VVD: eye, tooth for tooth. You endanger the life of agents, then I endanger yours.
After a short argument it became quiet for a while. The leader of the VVD realized that Hofman’s tweet had not endangered an agent at all, and said, “Okay, let me correct myself.” Yesilgöz took her remark back (and not because it was morally incorrect), but thought that Hofman had posed a colored position by starting his tweet with: “Are you abused by an agent …” and not, as Yesilgöz himself, as an alternative, suggested exactly the same. “Those two sentences.” And then we had not even arrived at the Douwe Bob case.
Replacement
In fact, it was a shame that the VVD leader hijacked this episode, because the important theme snowed completely. In the talk shows and the newspapers it was only about the naive performance of Yesilgöz later this Tuesday evening. Bee Today Inside (SBS) was openly speculated about the replacement of this “hesitant” VVD leader. That also happened Good evening Netherlands (NPO 1), of which editor -in -chief De Telegraaf Kamran Ullah said that Yesilgöz had been casual. Not well prepared, thoughtless, from the hip again. And also with News of the daya collaboration of SBS and De Telegraafit was about replacement.
Opinion maker Wierd Duk had taken Andrea Speyerbach to the studio, a philosopher who wants to sue the Dutch state for “damage caused to Dutch culture as a direct consequence of the decision to allow massive migration from countries with completely different cultures and customs.” By relying on ‘cultural human rights’, Speyerbach wants to protect our ‘indigenous environment and identity’. That brought them rather: “And by that I mean that rooted individuals, whose well -being is dependent on a culture that they recognize and values they share are now snowed under.”
Such woolly language seems nuanced, but the armpits of this pseudo-intellectual jacket smell to the racist irogment theory. In an interview with Duk in De Telegraaf Speyerbach wondered: “Do we have the right not to be replaced culturally and demographically?” Thomas van Groningen asked about blonde hair and blue eyes. “I understand the association, but that is definitely not the case.” Not? Oh, then I will take my comment back.