“We were at war with a dictator and now we are with a dictator supported by a traitor,” he said Claude Malhuret. Emmanuel Macron thinks the same, so he pronounced what is probably the most bleak discourse of a French president since World War II. Macron focused on the growing risk of direct shock between Russia and Europe, the so dreaded world war, while the French senator focused on Trump’s government, whom he considers a “traitor” to Western democracy at the service of a Russian dictator.
“Washington has become the court of Nero, with a incendiary emperor, submissive courtiers and a jester drugged with ketamine,” said the leader of Les Indespéndants, adding that it is “a drama for the free world and especially for the United States.” Since he presided over doctors without borders, Mouhuret expressed front of what he feels. That doctor who was mayor of Vichy and an official of Jacques Chirac, feels that the West is in the hands of two unbalanced megalomen, Trump, the “incendiary emperor”and Elon Musk, the alleged “jester drugged with ketamine.”
MALHURET He added something that should rumble throughout the United States: “Never in history a American president had capitulated before the enemy.” The words he said, almost on the verge of tears, the renuncant Justin Trudeau Explaining how Trump destroys, inconceivably, the historic brotherhood between Western and Canada superpower.
In the same handful of days, Macron appeared describing the third world war. After the ambush that Trump and Musk a Volodimir Zelenski In the White House, there is little space for reassuring readings about what is happening. That is why President Gallic called Europe to prepare for a direct war with Russia. A war that perceives inevitable and would be nuclear. Macron asked not to abandon Ukraine and described Russia as a threat to all of Europe. It is clear that Trump’s proposal is not peace and that Putin would betray any agreement as he made, according to kyiv, with the high the fire agreed in Minsk in 2014 to stop the conflict with the pro-ruse militias armed by Moscow in Donetsk and Lugansk.
It is absurd that Trump is postulated as a negotiator at the same time that he describes Ukraine as a defeated country as a winner, cuts military supplies and intelligence information to the Ukrainian army while lifting the economic sanctions to the Russian state, and considers Zelenski a failed capricious and Putin and a credible and reliable winner. The White House Chief acts as LukashenkoPutin’s Belarusian vassal, and pretends to be seen as a neutral pacifier.
Until now, war has had Ukraine as the only protagonist in the fight against Russia. But Macron’s speech describes a direct clash with all of Europe. That is why he talked about the atomic arsenal of France and offered a European nuclear umbrella that covers Ukraine. The French arsenal was a product of what Charles de Gaulle felt in 1956, when Eisenhower, from the White House, forced him and then British Premier Anthony Eden To immediately withdraw the forces sent to Egypt when Nasser nationalized the Suez channel.
May an American president take them out of the ears of the conflict they had initiated, made the founder the fifth republic provide France with atomic bombs so that he never decides in Washington which must be decided in Paris. The difference with the current Cold war. Or at least I could argue a logical reason. Instead Trump and his Neronian court do what Alexander Hamilton feared in the worst of his nightmares. That member of the “Founding Fathers”, who signed the declaration of independence, said that the greatest danger is that an agent of another power or someone susceptible to being manipulated by a foreign power.
In Macron’s gloomy speech, Trump is not only delivering Ukraine but placing Europe in the shadow of Russia, so that the goals raised by the Russian ultra -nationalist ideologist Alexander Dugin In his fourth political theory and in his book Eurasian Mission, in exchange for the Euroasy Empire, which he would cover from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic, he supports him in his plan to prevail from the Central American isthmus to the Canadian Arctic, including Greenland.
That is the other war that stalks Europe, because Trump has just told Congress that he will take over Greenland “in one way or another.” It was not one of the many phrases that triggers verbal incontinence and must also be read as the decision to abandon NATO: “We need Greenland for our security … and we will achieve it in one way or another.”
For the security of the United States it is not necessary to annex Greenland, because its membership in Denmark is made by NATO territory. In fact, there is an American military base on that Danish island: that of Thule, located in the Greenlandic district of Qaanaaq. “Tonight I also have a message for the incredible people who inhabits Greenland … we firmly support the right to determine their future, and if they choose it, we will welcome you to the United States,” he said. Beyond the interference in the internal affairs of Denmark, the most explosive words of the speech were those that completed the announcement that Greenland will be from the United States “one way or another.”
In those five words there is the threat to the Danish kingdom: if he does not agree to sell it to Washington or the 56 thousand Greenlands inhabitants, mostly of the Inuit ethnicity (the so -called Eskimos) decide in referendum to separate from the European country and integrate into the American superpower, the “or another” includes the invasion. If that happened, being a Denmark member, there would be war between Europe and the United States. Even more absurd, if Trump takes out his NATO country, the invasion of Greenland would activate article 5 of the Atlantic Pact and the United States would go into war with his own creation. Thus, big and dark is the “drama for the free world” described by Claude Malhuret, speaking of “the court of Nero” and the “jester drugged with ketamine.”
Image gallery
