A reader says he no longer votes for the PVV because that party is excluded by many other parties (Wuz, 25/6). They call that strategic molars. I think that’s wrong.
Then you reward parties that turn the democracy around and blackmailing are of paramount importance. After all, they ignore millions of voters and try to influence voting behavior by excluding. That is not easy to approve. Just vote for the party whose views are most similar to their own thoughts. Do not listen to election rhetoric, but look at how the parties voted for motions. Ja21 was pensions from the start against the Future Pensions Act, but Eerdmans voted against the MW motion. Joseph Agnes to give the participants the opportunity to choose whether or not to switch to the new pension system. He duped and thereby dawned millions (future) pensioners. A red flag, for example, is also the remarkable twist of D66 on immigration.
Some parties say one but ultimately do the other and are unreliable.
René Kardurk, Heerlen