The investigation into the Milanese urban planning could further complicate the scenario. The city risks mocking
Urgency. When we talk about the future of San Siro, it is certainly not a new word. But it is increasingly pressing. It envelops any reasoning, slips into all the bureaucratic folds, paints disheartening scenarios. Especially now that the Milanese administration is experiencing a very complicated moment because of the maxi investigation into urban planning. Milan, Inter and the Milanese mayor Sala are in a hurry, but now the list of those who observe with justifiable concern has stretched: in fact, yesterday a meeting took place at Palazzo Marino that saw the two Milanese clubs, the first citizen, Figc and Uefa at the table. Object on the agenda: the situation of Meazza in view of the European 2032, which Italy will host together with Turkey. Conclusions? Bad: the current Milanese system (the word “current” is obviously a crucial specification, since the direction is that of a totally new structure) does not have the requirements, it is not adequate for UEFA standards and could therefore not host the continental football review. Also because the modernization works would not be enough, although there are seven years of time: the structure is too dated to intervene effectively. All this despite Milan is the ideal city in terms of UEFA requirements regarding transport, accommodation facilities and the like. Municipality and Club, after the failure to assign the 2027 Champions League final, will have just over a year to present an alternative and definitive project. That’s why the new San Siro could be the solution to the problem: an investigation allowing, of course.
criticality
–
Yesterday’s summit was important because the FIGC will have to understand on which plants can rely on. We had started from ten proposals – Rome, Milan, Bari, Naples, Florence, Turin (Allianz Stadium), Genoa, Verona, Bologna, Cagliari -, it will be necessary to skim up to five. Situation? Gray: now as now the only one with all the requirements is the Allianz of Turin. The Rome Olimpico also requires works but in this case, being an institutional seat, the critical issues should then be overcome. Dead Line For the final list: October 2026. It seems a distant date but it is not, as the endless and impervious teaches process through which Milan and Inter have been trying for years to have a property system. THE’alert Out of € 2032, moreover, in the eyes of the two companies, the umpteenth confirmation of one of the cornerstones on the basis of which the project had started for a new stadium: the current one is not only too dated, that is, inadequate in the services, but a deep renovation plan would have a disproportionate cost. In fact, a hypothesis that Milan and Inter had pointed out to the Municipality of Milan to discard a priori.
scenario
–
And so, while right in these hours theprocess For the new San Siro recorded two points in favor – the no of the Tar of Lombardy to the request for suspension on the acquisition of the area by Milan and Inter, and the agreement between the club and the Municipality on the price of the stadium and the surrounding areas -, the tsunami in the Milanese real estate and political world raised by the Prosecutor’s Office, with heavy repercussions possible on some exponents of the local institutions (the mayor is also investigated) is an application). Gigante for the evolution of the project on the new stadium (on Monday, in the meantime, the junta plans to vote for the sale in a document to be deliberated in the city council by the end of the month). Under the lens there are over one hundred construction sites and of course San Siro is not in question, but the uncertainties about the timing – already very dilated – can only increase. The worst scenario would be that of a process That he gets bogged down again and, at the same time, the non -feasibility of a renovation of the Meazza. At that point the fool would have served.
© RESERVED REPRODUCTION