Dialogues in progress between the coach, Tasso and the club: we go towards the stay. The two Rossoneri promises will be sold to continue growth, as should have happened with the second team: relegation does not help management
Formally he would have obliged himself to start again from the words of Geoffrey Moncada: “It was the first year, playing in B, in C or D is not so important for us. For us it is important to create talent, create players”. A month ago the Rossoneri DT thus spoke of the future Milan after the ruinous relegation in D generated by the playout lost with the Spal (which, irony of fate, does not have the requirements to register again in C). A reflection that, legitimately, had been made to try to squeeze a reason for comfort, but which had raised more than one perplexity, equally legitimate. There is some firm point, however, that infuses confidence.
categories
–
The certainty – but this had been clarified immediately – is that the project will continue despite the blow from the sporting point of view. Sacrosanto that this is the case: the whole work, in the first year of life, cost about 15 million and would be a financial and design suicide to kill her in the cradle. And then – established that the DS Kirovski will remain in its place – there is a scenario that would lead to the confirmation of both Oddo and of the “Senior” consultant Tassotti. In these days they are both talking to the management and for both of them filters a certain optimism on the continuation of the relationship. The other basic aspect of the question focuses on the remodeling of management in light of the different category. In the ideas of the management, the load -bearing column evidently remains the same: to create players at home, gradually accompany the most promising young people towards the first team. In part it happened, regardless of everything it is a process that has been started. One account, however, is to do it starting from the C and another from the D. The categories are not questionable: one is professional, the other amateur, the definition is not interpretable. The first is necessarily a more training championship, the other less, although in both cases it is gyms useful for growth. But the distance between the fourth series and the A risks becoming excessive, especially in some cases.
minutage
–
Practical examples: Camarda and Zerooli in D, would they make sense? Would it be useful in view of their growth? The answer is even superfluous, and is also extendable to other profiles. So much so that in recent times for Francesco and Kevin they have been widely made rather concrete hypotheses of a season on loan elsewhere. A good B, perhaps, obviously looking for a solution where there are reasonable guarantees of use. Because in the end everything, or almost everything, revolves around the minute. Duty reflections, from which others arise: if the future Milan had managed to maintain the category, perhaps with major ambitions, Camarda and Zeroi would have remained? Would they have managed to live that virtuous situation of gradual accompaniment to the world of the greats that last season was lived very partially (235 ‘in the first team for Francesco, 12’ for Kevin, then diverted to Monza in January)? The reasoning is lawful precisely because both would seem to be destined for a season on loan elsewhere. A “classic” loan, that is, as usual adopted by all clubs – even by those who do not have second teams – to grow their boys.
© RESERVED REPRODUCTION