The cross between Nancy Pazos and Mariana Brey in To Barbarossa (Telefe) Keep climbing and threatens to move from the small screen to the courts. The spark went on during the debate on the announcement of the 2026 budget, when Brey accused his colleague of “Coup” And Pazos reacted without filters, calling her “Pelotuda“LIVE. The tension overflowed to the point that neither the interventions of Georgina Barbarossa They managed to contain the scene.
Minutes later, in Intruders (America TV), the journalist resumed the issue and slid the possibility of initiating legal actions, considering that the accusation constitutes a crime. “They did not become aware of how serious it is. She is to be sitting in courts accused of accusing someone of a crime,” said Pazos with hardness. And while he acknowledged that his response was impulsive, he was not repentant: “I insult it, it is wrong, it is wrong. But I love using all the words of the dictionary. And as he said Fontanarrosa, It is not the same to say ‘silly’ as ‘Pelotuda’. He deserved to tell him that. ”
In that same tone, she accused Brey of reading lines descended in the program: “She uses the lyrics that happen to her. If you saw her yesterday I was quiet, because she had not received lyrics. Today she talked to the four things noted. It is paperonesco. More than once I told her that she is the adorni of the table, she cannot hold a discussion.”
The confrontation was not an isolated episode. For months, both maintain antagonistic political positions that are enhanced in each discussion. The trigger for this last dispute was the national chain message of Javier Milei, that opened the debate on the economic situation and gave rise to the most rough exchange between the two journalists. Brey insisted that the opposition seeks to weaken the government and accused Pazos of being part of that strategy: “An coup opposition who does not want the president to end his mandate,” he launched.

Pazos’s reaction was immediate: “There is no person with more commitment to democracy than me. Do I have to bank this ball saying that I am a coup?” Between interruptions, irony and crossed reproaches, it was clear that the relationship between the two is at its most critical point.
In parallel, Marina Calabró reviewed LAPE INFORMATIVE SOCIAL CLUB The details of the fight, adding another layer of media impact to a conflict that does not seem to have a close ending. Given the consultation of whether he will take the matter to justice, Pazos did not rule out: “I’m going to see, I’m fed up. Let him take care if he wants to play this game. She did not apologize. I apologized.” With the increasingly found positions, the confrontation threatens to become one of the most resonant television scandals of the year.


