Since he left power, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner has been experiencing a notable turn in her communicational style in social networks, especially in the tone. That change intensified even more since the beginning of his house prison.
In Argentina, X (former Twitter) has more than 7 million users and, in its account – where millions of followers and detractors alike gather – CFK holds a clear strategy: convert each publication into a political battlefield.
Although the decline of institutional power usually leaves former presidents in silence or in the background, the case of Cristina breaks the norm. After the assumption of Javier Milei, he left behind the formal and institutional tone that had predominated during his last stage as vice president, and launched fully to a more direct, emotional and ironic communication.
Thus was born a new digital version of the ex -president: the CFK of the “Che Milei”, of the sharp phrases, designed more to viralize than to explain. Instead of long arguments, it offers short and provocative sentences that directly challenge the President or their policies, and that function as easily replicable content for their digital militancy. To inform to provoke, from the personal to the personal: that was the first turn.
But the second turn arrived in June, when it began to meet house prison. And there was another Cristina. A more relaxed, self -referential, ironic. Phrases like “Can I go to the balcony appear or not?” or “what level of obsession, bro”, which mix sarcasm, centennial culture codes and even a certain absurd humor. The combative CFK gives way to an almost digital political character, which does not seek to impose authority but generate empathy with its followers and consolidate a new type of presence: symbolic, informal, provocative.
This new narrative – as a victim of the judicial system – is not accidental or improvised. Language changes, but the strategy remains: to remain relevant in an ecosystem where it no longer has formal power, but can influence.
Behind the ironic and decontracted tone, there is a political communication structure that does not lose sight of its objectives. Cristina no longer speaks for everyone: he speaks for his. The public is redefined. From a broad and institutional hearing, it becomes focusing on digital militants, disenchanted voters and, above all, in its direct adversary, either Milei or the Judiciary.
In that sense, their messages are not propositive, but reagents. Cristina communicates based on what happens around her, from a resistance position.
Without power, without freedom and with an increasingly reduced electorate, everything is committed to a land where it can still win: the symbolic. And he does it with tools adapted to the times. Understand the digital pulse, dominate the codes of viralization and never underestimate the power of a well -used social network.
His X account is more than a social network: it is his discursive trench, where he fights narrative, marks enemies, holds fidelities and, above all, he keeps present. In a country where politics is also disputed in the field of emotions, digital communication is not an accessory: it is a form of power.
You may also interest you
