British Prime Minister Keir Starmer put in ‘Dickensian cutbacks’

He will have woken up with a hefty male, analyzing British media after Prime Minister Keir Starmer had to bind a lot on Tuesday. Austerity and reform of two social security laws were weakened and partly suspended to win enough support from their own Labor rates. The government received a majority behind it, but was burdened by the adjustments with a gap on the budget of around 5.5 billion euros. And the resistance from the left flank of the Labor faction did not run: 49 members remained against the austerity of schemes for people with disabilities, among others.

The uprising within Labor and Tuesday’s difficult debate mark the first year of Keir Starmer as Prime Minister. His party won the elections last year on July 4 with a large majority, after fourteen years in which the conservatives were in power in the United Kingdom. Labor took 412 of the 650 seats in the Lower House. Internationally, Starmer appreciated, among other things, the Handelsdeal he managed to close with Trump and the major role that the British took in supporting Ukraine.

But Starmer is struggling in his own country. Inflation remains on the high side with around 3.5 percent and economic growth is disappointing. Of the ten last prime ministers, according to opinion level yougov, only Liz Truss – who was in power for only 45 days – was less popular.

Two schemes

The Labor government announced the financial plans for the government period until 2029 three weeks ago. The intention is that there will be a lot more money to education, health care and defense. But to pay for that, among other things, social security must be cut. The costs of two schemes have risen so fast in the last five years that the government was forced to intervene. The first scheme, the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), is about benefits for people with a long -term illness, a disability or a mental illness. The second, the Universal Credit, regulates financial support for people with a low income, job seekers or people who cannot work.

Zoom in

According to the BBC, three million people in England and Wales claimed the benefits in 2019. In March of this year, that number had grown by four million, especially by people with a mental illness. Expenditure has increased by tens of billions and would – without measures – reach around 84 billion euros in 2029. By reducing benefits and sharpening criteria, the government wanted to cut more than 6 billion euros on this. The cabinet says it is also to implement the freshener to get more people to work.

There was a lot of protest against the plans in recent days, including a coalition of 138 organizations of people with disabilities. Partly because of this, the procedure in part of Labor was heavy on the stomach. Under pressure from around 120 Labor parliamentarians, the government was willing to mitigate the measures, among other things by asserting them only for new cases. The stricter criteria for being eligible for benefits were also weakened at the last minute. The government also promised to await the exact consequences of the plans.

Part of the Labor group still voted against, because an analysis by the government itself showed that 150,000 of the most vulnerable people would end up in poverty, even after a series of concessions. “These Dickensian cutbacks are part of a different era and another party,” said Labor parliamentarire Rachael Maskel during the debate. “They are far from what this Labor party stands for: a party that protects the poor.” Another Labor parliamentarian, Meg Hillier, who finally agreed, warned starmer: from now on he has to listen better to what is going on in the supporters.

To share





Mail the editors